Answer:
Negative punishment.
Explanation:
As the exercise briefly describes, when a stimulus is removed from a person or animal, resulting in a decrease in the probability of response, it is known as negative punishment. In behavioral terms, positive means adding whereas negative means taking. The goal of punishment is to decrease a determined behavior. Therefore, if a person takes something good for example a dog's bone, when the dog behaves poorly, it will likely decrease this response. And, if the dog behaves well, and you give him the bone, this will make him tend to act like that.
Szasz points to how people have learned the deviant or odd behaviors instead of hidden psychological causes. Seeing as Dr. Szasz felt that psychological underpinnings were of less value than the actual behaviors (i.e., he argued that there were no objective tests for designating a DSM diagnosis), the more important concept to be understood was <span><u>why the person learned to behave as they did.</u></span>
The Security Council does not precisely speak to the power focuses of the worldwide framework. IGO has turned out to be progressively unmistakable both in encouraging clash determination between states, yet in addition in managing obstinate clashes inside states. They serve various fundamental capacities that improve the likelihood of participation. Made after World War I, the League of Nations was an early endeavor to systematize outsider intercession in universal clash.
Research suggests that parents who spank their children usually administer
spanking : <span> as a last resort after other punishments have failed.
In most cases, these parents are frustated with their child behaviors and only administer the punishment because other efforts that involve communicating with the children has failed</span>
Answer: Your question is incomplete. Please let me assume this to be your question;
A student watches the teacher fold a napkin, the student went home and helped the mother to fold napkin for her baby sister. Through what learning process did the students learn to fold the napkin? Correct Answer(s) Drag appropriate answer(s) here
a. vicarious conditioning
b. negative reinforcement
c. verbal instructions alone
d. observational learning modeling
ANSWER: Option a and option d are most correct option. Vicarious conditioning and observational learning model.
Explanation: vicarious conditioning is an Observational learning model, were one learn by observation. That means option a and option d means the same thing and can be used interchangeably. In vicarious learning, communication is non verbal and uninvolved, as the person learns by only observing the person perform a task.
Because the student has learnt how to fold a napkin by only watching the teacher folding the napkin, it is an Observational learning.
