The nativists believed that immigrants would destroy America. So, option (b) can be considered as the suitable option.
<h3>Why do nativists oppose immigration?</h3>
Joel S. Fetzer claims that conflicts over national, cultural, and religious identity frequently lead to hostility to immigration in many nations. Particularly in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, as well as in continental Europe, the phenomenon has been examined. As a result, the term "nativism" has evolved to refer broadly to opposition to immigration motivated by worries that newcomers may "distort or corrupt" preexisting cultural norms. Nativist movements try to stop cultural change when immigrants outnumber native-born people by a wide margin.
Many of the following arguments against immigrants are used to support immigration restrictionist sentiment :
Economic :
- Employment : Immigrants take occupations that would have been open to native citizens otherwise, which reduces native employment. They also produce a labor surplus, which drives down wages.
- Immigrants incur a cost to the government since they do not pay enough taxes to pay for the services they need.
- Social welfare systems are heavily utilized by immigrants.
- Housing : As vacancies are reduced by immigrants, rents rise.
Cultural
- Language : Immigrants refuse to pick up the native tongue and withdraw into their own communities.
- Culture : As immigrants outnumber the local populace, their culture will take its place.
- Crime : Compared to the native population, immigrants are more likely to commit crimes.
- Patriotism : Immigrants erode a country's feeling of ethnic and national identity.
To know more about, immigration, visit :
brainly.com/question/17124402
#SPJ9
If your talking accent Egypt then women have some strict rights. They have to stay home to take care of the house and the children. Thats all i know.
Answer:
Social Discrimination of Great Britian
Explanation:
Britian had started putting taxes and many peasants, who most made up the empire. They worked for less than other which made them angry against the treatment. They sought indepedence from Britian which let to the American Revolution
The statement "Kersaint owned plantations and other property in the French Caribbean"does not called for an immediate abolition of slavery.
<h3>Who is
Armand-Guy Kersaint?</h3>
He was a sailor and politician who held an important naval posts during the early stages of the French Revolution.
Hence, the true statements about Armand-Guy Kersaint during the Napoleon French includes:
- he advocates for encouraging the willing migration of Africans to French colonies rather than their enslavement.
- he had participated in military campaigns against the British in the Caribbean and during the American Revolution.
- he called for abolishing the traditional privileges of the French nobility in France and its colonies.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Napoleon French
<em>brainly.com/question/361806</em>
