There was different effects for it. I'm not sure if your question is free response or multiple choice but some effects were: widening the gap between the rich and poor, making inner cities have even worse conditions, the beatniks rose to counter the middle class lifestyle, schools in suburbs were better than the ones in inner cities
Answer:King James II, the second son of Charles I, ascended the English throne in 1685 on the death of his brother, Charles II. ... This meant centralizing English political strength around the throne, giving the monarchy absolute power.
How do you think Bush v Gore should have been settled?
At heart of the matter was the infamous "butterfly ballot" which supposedly confused the easily-confounded elderly of Palm Beach county—supposedly to Bush's advantage.
As the confusion wore on and America needed a president A.S.A.P., Florida eventually validated the Bush vote. Additionally, George W.'s brother Jeb Bush was the Florida governor; and, the Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, who officially validated the Bush-vote, had been appointed by Jeb.
The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy-- who was seven-eighths Caucasian-- took a seat in a "white's only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested.
QUESTION:
Is Louisiana's law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the 14th amendment. (Is it unconstitutional, basically.)
ANSWER: No the state law is within constitutional boundaries. The judges based their decision on the separate-but-equal doctrine (keep in mind this was in 1896), that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. In this case, they ruled that segregation does not, in itself, constitute unlawful discrimination.
Basically everything about Plessey v. Ferguson.
He supported the policy of moving native americans west of the mississippi river (also known as the indian removal act) because of how he believed that removing them would get more land available for settlement.