In the short-run, the effect on the price level and the real GDP is <em>a. Both the </em><em>price level </em><em>and </em><em>real GDP </em><em>rise.</em>
Since the economy is in long-run equilibrium in 2019, and the stock prices unexpectedly rise and stay high for a long time, it means that the price level does not:
- Rise while the real GDP falls
-
Fall while the real GDP rises
-
Fall with the real GDP.
<u>Question Options</u>:
a. both the price level and real GDP rise.
b. the price level rises and real GDP falls.
c. the price level falls and real GDP rises.
d. both the price level and real GDP fall.
Thus, in the short-term of this economy both the price level and real GDP rise.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/13029724
Answer:
The answer is monopolistic competition.
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition refers to a market type where there are several producers who sell the same type of products, but differentiated from one another; thus making their products unable to be substituted for one another. This is the case in the scenario at the question; though there are multiple companies producing natural and artificial flavorings, due to the different in how they taste, each company’s product cannot be substituted with one another’s.
According to empirical research, in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
<u>Explanation</u>
A <u>Moral hazard</u> is said to have occurred when one party (i.e insured Party) increases its exposure to risk ,because some other party bears the cost of those Risk.It reflects the tendency of a person to take more risk as the consequence of the risk taken has to be beard by some other party
<u>The moral hazard problem is </u><u>less </u><u> severe in bond markets than in stock markets. In addition, moral hazard arises in bond markets when firms issue bonds with high default risk.</u>
<u />
So it is appropriate to say that , in countries where stockholders' rights are strong, firms issue <u>More </u>stock than in countries where stockholders' rights are weak. Researchers conclude that strong stockholders' rights <u>reduce</u> moral hazard in stock markets.
In Volkswagen, part of the reason, I believe, that they stayed in Russia, is because Russia and Germany have, in many instances, combined military and political forces. For Russia, it's a pro to their economy because they are able to hire more people there. It is a con in the sense that it may cost Volkswagen more money to be there in Russia than what their income may total.
Answer:
A) 29%
Explanation:
W= (.14-.05)(.39^2)-(.21-.05)(.20)(.39)(.4)
(.14-.05)(.39^2)+(.21-.05)(.20^2) - (.14-.05+.21-.05)(.20)(.39)(.4)
B = 71% A =1-0.71= 29%
σ2rp = (.292)(.392) + (.712)(.202) + 2(.29)(.71)(.39)(.20).4
σ2rp = .045804
σrp = 21.4%