I have to think again about this answer. I will get back! 2.22
Answer: I am right, the increased demand represents a rightward shift of the aggregate demand curve.
Explanation:
The increase in aggregate demand by foreigners occurred as a result of a fall in the value of the US dollars and aggreagrate price level stayed the same. Therefore, the change in aggregate demand didn't occur as a result of a change in price.
If agregrate demand changed as a result of a change in the aggregate price levels, there would be a change in quantity demanded and a movement along the demand curve.
It's only a change in price that result results in a movement along the aggregate demand curve.
Other factors that leads to a change in demand either shifts the aggregate demand curve to the left or to the right.
Therefore, an increase in aggregate demand as a result of the fall in value of US dollars causes the aggregate demand curve to shift to the right.
The shift in the aggregate demand curve to the right shows that demand has increased but aggregate price hasn't changed.
The outcome of the ceiling price $800 rent is that the quantity supplied will remains at the same.
<h3>What is a price ceiling?</h3>
This refers to a price order by the government that keeps a price from rising above a certain level known as the “ceiling”.
In the graph, the horizontal line at the price of $800 shows the maximum price set by the rent control law.
The forces that shifted the demand curve to the right are still there, but, at this price, the quantity supplied will remains at the same 15,000 rental units although the quantity demanded is 19,000 rental units.
Read more about price ceiling
<em>brainly.com/question/2759444</em>
#SPJ1
Go to Sales, then select All Sales. Find and select the desired estimate from the Money Bar. Change the Estimate Status from Closedto Accepted.
...
Select Acceptedfrom the Status drop-down arrow.
When you see, The Transaction you are editing is linked to others. ...
Select Save and close.
Add the estimate to a new invoice.
Answer:
The statement is true.
Explanation:
It is a legal metaphor created to describe when an evidence is obtained illegally. It means that this evidence contaminates the entire process. It tains and the defense or accusation, will not be able to use this evidence. The judge will not be allowed to consider this illegal evidence to convict or to absolve the person in trial.
However we have four exceptions, in which the tainted evidence wil be admissible:
1. If it was founded in part as a result of an untainted source.
2. If it would be discovered anyway, despite of the illegal source.
3. The chain of causation between the ilegal action and the tainted source is too attenuated.
4. The search warrant was not found to be valid based on probable cause. It is called the good faith exception.
