1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nookie1986 [14]
3 years ago
5

"as children spend more time watching tv, they are more likely to be ____ and spend less time ____."

Social Studies
1 answer:
enot [183]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

lazy, outside?

Explanation:

I was honestly not sure on the first one but the second one makes sense, at least to me. parents generally want their kids to play outside

You might be interested in
Durkheim felt that to create a society without crime would be _____________________________________.
Lemur [1.5K]

Based on the previous works, Durkheim felt that creating a society without crime would be <u>impossible</u>.

<h3>Emile Durkheim</h3>

Emile Durkheim is a famous French sociologist who was generally considered as one of the fathers of modern social science alongside the likes of Karl Max and Max Weber.

In one of his submissions, he concluded that it is <u>impossible</u> to create a society without crime.

According to him, some minor crimes are essential and valuable to society. Otherwise, society could not exist without it.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Impossible</u>."

Learn more about Durkheim here: brainly.com/question/8837353

8 0
2 years ago
Investigators can individualize blood evidence by
snow_lady [41]
The answer would be : by comparing the DNA from the test using the Kastle-Meyer test.  Kastle-Mayer test is used to detect possible presence of hemoglobin in the DNA. This results could be compared to the Law enforcement's database to find out the one's who is involved in the crime scene
3 0
3 years ago
Indicate whether each statement is cierto or falso based on the en detalle reading.
melamori03 [73]
False or truth what question
4 0
2 years ago
Why did the anti-federalists want a bill of rights included in the constitution?.
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

They wanted people's rights to be protected.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
HELP!! 50 POINTS!!
Contact [7]
No; both sides believe that the god they believe in gave them that land. They also believe it to be highly holy. As long as religion is in the equation, constant conflict in inevitable. It is possible to end the conflict; just highly unlikely. If everybody on both sides were suddenly unbelievers, nobody would be fighting over it so fervently. There`d be dispute, but not pointless war.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do the european union (eu) and the world trade organization (wto) have in common?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the difference between interpersonal communication and impersonal communication
    13·1 answer
  • Which feature is generally part of unlimited government
    10·2 answers
  • A study in the 1990s found that residents of Mexico City had higher levels of lead and cadmium in their blood than did residents
    15·2 answers
  • What was the main outcome of the mexican war? A. Mexicos army defeated the united states forces California and texas became part
    13·1 answer
  • FREE BRAINLEST The Morrill Act gave land to colleges and universities in exchange for teaching which of the following fields?
    10·2 answers
  • In the United States, which group actually makes most of the economic decisions? the legislative branch the executive branch the
    10·2 answers
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS ALL MY QUESTIONS!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • A train traveled 504 miles in 8 hours. A bus traveled 531 miles in 9 hours. Which mode of transportation has the faster rate?
    13·1 answer
  • How would you write this in 4 complete sentences?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!