The Milgram experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, and it measured the obedience that people display towards authority figures. In these experiments, participants were asked to obey an authority figure who asked them to administer shocks to a patient. The shocks were not real, but the participants were not aware of this.
There are several ethical dilemmas here, with the most important one being the trauma that the experiment might have caused on participants. The experiment showed many people that they were actually capable of committing terrible atrocities just to follow orders. This was a realization that had a significant impact on people.
Although no one was physically shocked, many people believed that the subjects were, and this was a source of stress and worry for participants. Moreover, this also means that the participants were not told all the details of the experiment, which some critics find unethical. I do not think that the ends always justify the means, and I think this situation presented some serious ethical problems. If a replication of the experiment actually shocked people, the ethical problems would increase.
The experiment found that a very high percentage of people were willing to compromise their ethical values in order to fulfill the orders of others, even when this caused pain to the subjects.
<span>the answer the patrician are wealthy and the plebeians are poor!</span>
The system of checks and balances is an important part of the Constitution. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the others. This way, no one branch becomes too powerful. Each branch “checks” the power of the other branches to make sure that the power is balanced between them. How does this system of checks and balances work?
The process of how laws are made (see the following page) is a good example of checks and balances in action. First, the legislative branch introduces and votes on a bill. The bill then goes to the executive branch, where the President decides whether he thinks the bill is good for the country. If so, he signs the bill, and it becomes a law.
If the President does not believe the bill is good for the country, he does not sign it. This is called a veto. But the legislative branch gets another chance. With enough votes, the legislative branch can override the executive branch's veto, and the bill becomes a law.
Once a law is in place, the people of the country can test it through the court system, which is under the control of the judicial branch. If someone believes a law is unfair, a lawsuit can be filed. Lawyers then make arguments for and against the case, and a judge decides which side has presented the most convincing arguments. The side that loses can choose to appeal to a higher court, and may eventually reach the highest court of all, the Supreme Court.
If the legislative branch does not agree with the way in which the judicial branch has interpreted the law, they can introduce a new piece of legislation, and the process starts all over again.
The Federal Government is known to have the most power.