1. The first six beings were the First man, first woman, salt woman, fire god,coyote, and Begochiddy. Cat people occupied the first world and the water monster flooded the third world to force the Coyote to give him his baby back.
2. The first humans were made from the stone of an enormous mountain of rock. Pachacamac Bore had a son and daughter out of pity and sent them to earth to help the first humans. Inca cities were divided into northern and southern halves, it representing the male and female forces.
3. Muspell was a fiery realm, that had rivers of poison and lakes of fire. After Ymir came a cow , Odin became king of all gods and Odin named the new world Midgurd “the middle land”.
4. He gave birth to his son by spitting him out and Hathor is the godess of love and beauty. Autums children went missing and he sent a searchout for them and when they returned he was so happy that he cried tears of joy, and as the tears hit the earth, they became the first men.
5. Humans grew from the first reeds on earth and this reed was called the “uthlanga” which means “source of all things. Unkulunkulu sent out the languid cameleon to spread the word that his people would never die.
The Latter Day Saints began settling in and around Independence<span>, </span>Missouri<span>, in 1831. </span>Their<span> customs, and </span>their<span> religious and political attitude were not in harmony with the feelings and prejudices of </span>their neighbors<span>. This resulted in bitterness and opposition which in time led to friction and conflict.</span>
Answer:
Civil Liberties.
Explanation:
These are protected by parts of the Constitution such as the Bill of Rights and also the precedent established by courts since the writing of the Constitution.
Abstract: Although there are many scholarly treatments of the Founders’ understanding of property and economics, few of them present an overview of the complete package of the principles and policies upon which they agreed. Even the fact that there was a consensus among the Founders is often denied. Government today has strayed far from the Founders’ approach to economics, but the older policies have not been altogether replaced. Some of the Founders’ complex set of policies to protect property rights are still in force. America has abandoned the Founders’ views on the gold and silver standard, the prohibition of monopolies, the presumption of freedom to use property as one likes, freedom of contract, and restricting regulation to the protection of health, safety, and morals. But in other respects, America continues to offer a surprising degree of protection to property rights in the Founders’ sense of that term.
In light of the stark differences between the economies of the present day and the late 18th century in which the Founders lived, can we learn anything about economics by studying the principles and approach of our Founders? Perhaps surprisingly, the answer is “yes.” If we look to the actions they took and the rationale they offered for their actions, we will see that the Founders’ approach still offers us a guide to pressing economic questions of our day.
Although there are many scholarly treatments of the Founders’ understanding of property and economics, few of them present an overview of the complete package of the principles and policies upon which they agreed. Even the fact that there was a consensus among the Founders is often denied. Scholars who study this topic often focus on their differences rather than their agreements.
It is true that there were bitter disputes over particular policies during the Founding era, such as the paying of the national debt, the existence of a national bank, and whether to subsidize domestic manufactures, and these differences seemed tremendously important in the 1790s. But in spite of these quarrels, there was a background consensus on both principles and the main lines of economic policy that government should follow. John Nelson’s verdict on the 1790s is sound: “[W]hen the causes of the slow dissolution of consensus among America’s ruling elites after ratification of the Constitution are detailed, the evidence points to specific disagreements over programmatic issues and not fundamental schisms over the essential role of government.”[1]
The danger is that by concentrating on these and other Founding-era contests, we will fail to see (as the Founders themselves often failed to see) their agreement on the three main policies that, taken together, provide the necessary protection of property rights: the legal right to own and use property in land and other goods; the right to sell or give property to others on terms of one’s own choosing (market freedom); and government support of sound money. Their battles were fought over the best means to those ends and over such subordinate questions as whether and how large-scale manufacturing should be encouraged.
The Founders’ approach to economics, when it is discussed by public figures and intellectuals, has been much criticized. One reason many on the Left reject the Founders’ economic theory is that they think it encourages selfishness and leads to an unjust distribution of wealth. The prominent liberal thinker Richard Rorty believed that the “moral and social order” bequeathed to Americans by the Founders eventually became “an economic system which starves and mutilates the great majority of the population.” Such is the “selfishness” of an “unreformed capitalist economy.” For this reason, there is “a constant need for new laws and new bureaucratic initiatives which would redistribute the wealth produced by the capitalist system.”[2]
