<h3>
Answer:</h3>
Behaviorism
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why "Behaviorism" would be the correct answer is because what the psychologist described as a possible factor for Johnny's behavior is related to Behaviorism.
Behaviorism is when experts can study a person's behavior and can see that the person's behavior is caused by its environment. What this means is that a person's behavior could be based upon their surroundings.
In this case, the reason why Johnny is acting this way is because he watched too many violent movies and played too many violent games. The violent movies and games that he saw and played would be the environment.
The environment, the violent movies and games, caused him to act the way he's acting. His behavior is being based upon the stuff he's watching, and that's the environment that's leading him to being very aggressive towards his siblings and peers. Since he's around an environment of violence, he's behavior starts to act with violence.
If it wasn't for the environment,. the violent movies and games, then he would probably be behaving different, due to the act that he's not around an environment of violence.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
A. Gross Domestic Product per capita.
Answer:
letting the toy car roll down a ramp
Explanation:
correct me if im wrong
hope its help
Answer:
Total workers = 2,000,000
Total unemployed workers = 332,000
Unemployment Percentage = ( Total unemployed ÷ Total workers ) x 100
therefore, Unemployment percentage = ( 332000÷ 2000000 ) x 100 = 0.166 x 100 = <u>16.6%</u>
hope it's helps ya...
By : Modern Einstein
Answer:
a) Chimel vs. California
Explanation:
The Chimel vs California case was a result of police officers going to Chimel's home with a warrant that authorized his arrest for burglary. After the warrant was served, the police officers comprehensively searched the house of Chimel. The search revealed various items that were used as exhibit to convict Chimel. The State Courts upheld Chimel's conviction. However the Supreme Court in a 6-2 decision, did not find the search of the full house reasonable, as a search warrant would be needed for this cause.
