Answer:
the question is incomplete:
It happens that the set of consumption bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is indifferent between (xA,xB) and (20,5) is the set of all bundles such that xB = 100/xA. The set of bundles (xA,xB) such that Charlie is just indifferent between (xA,xB) and the bundle (10,15) is the set of bundles such that xB = 150/xA.
I also found the attached graph.
The requirements are:
- Is (30,5) ≈ (10,15) true or false?
- Is (10,15) > (20,5) true or false?
- Is (20,5) ≥ (10,10) true or false?
- Is (24,4) ≥ (11,9.1) true or false?
- Is (11,14) > (2,49) true or false?
- A set is convex if for any two points in the set, the line segment between them is also in the set. Is the set of bundles that Charlie weakly prefers to (20,5) a convex set?
- Is the set of bundles that Charlie considers inferior to (20,5) a convex set?
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his ______________ ___ of ___________ at that point.
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (10,10).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (5,20).
- Find Charlie’s marginal rate of substitution at the point (20,5).
- Do the indifference curves you have drawn for Charlie exhibit diminishing marginal rates of substitution?
Answers:
- true, they are on the same red line
- true, (10,15) is on the red line while (20,5) is on the blue line
- true, they are equivalent since both are on the blue line
- false, (11,9.1) is on the blue line and (24,4) is on the red line
- true, (11,14) is on the red line while (2,29) is on the blue portion
- yes, it is a convex set
- no, they are not a convex set
- The slope of Charlie’s indifference curve through a point, (xA,xB), is known as his <u>RATE</u> of <u>SUBSTITUTIO</u>N at that point.
- marginal rate of substitution at (10,10) = -10/10 = -1
- marginal rate of substitution at (5,20) = -20/5 = -4
- marginal rate of substitution at (20,5) = -5/20 = -1/4 = -0.25
- yes, this curves shows diminishing marginal rates of substitutions, e.g. goes from -4 to -1 to -0.25
The Christmas tree farm would respond by:
- In the short run, producers are going to earn profits and also increase their supply of the product.
This is what usually happens whenever there is an increase in the prices of goods in the supply side of the market.
As the prices would go up, the producers would want to take advantage of the increases to make as much gain as they can from the market.
This is only short term profit. Therefore the supply is going to be inelastic. The demand is only going to available for a short while.
Read more on brainly.com/question/25083966?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
what is your question though? I don't understand
The correct answers are 1. short-term, and 2. concerns about equity and reciprocity.
Answer:
$99.09
Explanation:
Calculation for What is Tricki's expected price when it begins trading ex-rights
Using this formula
Expected price=Stock rights-on- [ (Stock rights-on-Subscription price)÷(10 rights+ One share)]
Let plug in the formula
Expected price=$100-[($100-$90)÷(10+1)]
Expected price=$100-($10÷11)
Expected price=$100-$0.91
Expected price=$99.09
Therefore Tricki's expected price when it begins trading ex-rights will be $99.09