Answer:
1.) You want to answer, possibly, your hypothesis.
2.) If you have a prompt and a claim, write your hypothesis down in this form: If ______________, then________________.
3.) Use the scientific process of performing an experiment, like observation, measurement, etc.
4.) LABEL all the sides of your (bar, line, etc) graph.
5.) Write a sentence using your graph in this form:
It (increased/decreased)_________ because _________.
This value is the (greatest/least) __________ because ___________.
6.) Explain why or why not the hypothesis supported your observations and measurements.
My hypothesis (did/didn't) support my experiment because ____________.
7.) In other words, how does your graph, observations, etc., go along with your hypothesis?
Hope this helps.
Explanation:
No because Chiang did not experience with what happened
Answer:
The correct answer is 'd' No, because Rhizbium radiobacter only infects wounded area of the plant and those regions are already dead.
Explanation:
Rhizobium is a genus of gram negative, soil bacteria that forms symbiotic relationship with certain plant, fixing nitrogen. However, soil borne plant pathogen, <em>Agrobacterium tumefaciens, </em>or rhizobium radiobacter, are tumor producing species that does not in anyway benefit the plant. The have a tendency to cause crown gall tumors by transfering T-DNA of its Ti plasmid intp a plant cell, where the T-DNA becomes integrated into the plant genome, Hence causing overproduction of plant growth hormones which ultimately results in tumor. A. tumefaciens does not elicit a typical Hypersensitivity response in a plant. As it enters only through wounds in the plant and these regions are already dead, hence no hypersensitivity response is produced by the plant.
The answer is most likely C. Can be used and consumed without risk.
