It depends the goal of the argumentative paper. If you are arguing for a clear purpose use the expert testimony because of its credibility. Although if you are arguing and spitballing around about a topic then use your opinion about it.
<span />
Answer:
Shirley suffers from communication apprehension
Explanation:
The answer is that from this scenario, we can conclude that Shirley suffers from communication apprehension because this refers to a fear a person has in regards to the communication with other people and in the statement it says that Shirley asks for repeated clarifications over what she has to say in e-mails or phone calls, she asks Debra to proofread her e-mails and avoids talking to people which shows the fear she has to the communication with people.
The other options are not right because Shirley is really concern about what she writes and she doesn't do it in a superficial way, the situation is not related to Debra putting less effort when working with a group, Shirley is not passing a message through different people before talking to Debra and they don't come from a high-context culture because it seems that they rely on verbal communication.
Answer:
the answer is C
Explanation:
because when soldiers clean your gun and get cut that can quickly get into pneumoniaquickly because they had a lack of Clean Water they were always saying in dirty water never clean their self with clean water
The correct answer for this question would be option B. ALL OF THESE ARE CORRECT. The examples of the culture theory of prejudice would be the following: Thomas's vicious cycle theory, Theodor Adorno's research on prejudiced people and lastly, Bogardus's <span>research on social distance. Hope this answer helps.</span>
I believe your answer would be, An individual who exhibits a lot of deference, and ritualistic behaviors, and who would disapprove of emotional displays in public belongs to a culture described as COLLECTIVE.
Hope that helps!!!!