Use the important details of each paragraph.You don't have to use each one as long as it covers the BME .
I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
Answer:
The book's enduring cultural relevance and authority in the digital age is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Through history, specially during the recent period, books have been considered very important as they register the events of humankind. Due to the extension, more work has to be done and books have always been related to culture and they are a symbol of it. Due to all this factor, their authority and relevance is bigger than the one from newspapers and magazines.
Answer:
According to Ostergaard, "TV plots and characters tended to be simple."
Explanation:
To embed a quote you must first put your own words before the quote to lead into it and then put in the quote. You can put sources of who or where the quote is from.
For example:
<em>During the Near Apocalypse of '09, "Ra's al Ghul was apparently defeated by Batman once and for all."</em>
