Answer:
united
Explanation:
Solomon was succeeded by his son, Rehoboam who became the <em>King of the United Monarchy of Israel</em>. However, this only happened for a while because a rebellion occurred under the leadership of Jeroboam regarding the <em>reduction of taxes.</em> Ten of the tribes rebelled when their petition was ignored. Thus, they withdrew from David's house and pronounced Jeroboam as the first king of the north <em>(The Kingdom of Israel)</em>. This left Rehoboam with only the southern kingdom<em> (The Kingdom of Judah)</em>.
In celebration, Peter assumed the title of emperor as well as tsar, and Muscovy officially became the Russian Empire in 1721. Peter the Great did not expand Russia's borders as much as and Catherine the Great but the territory he added of the Baltic was of utmost strategic importance.
The American Revolution didn't affect directly the Native Americans. It affected them because when the colonists won, it was official they had lost vast territories and would have to share land extensions with colonists. The Proclamation of 1763 wasn't so forceful after the war, because the colonists were independent from the King and he couldn't give them orders anymore. The Proclamation of 1763 kept colonists east of the Appalachian Mountains, just so you remember. France owed a large piece of land that was west of the Appalachian, and the colonists eventually bought it. Further on, they also took hold of the area around California and Florida. So as you see, the Natives were being taken away from lands and this led them to live in reservations. Nowadays, natives can live anywhere they want but many choose to live in reservations.
Coal is the most used mineral source right now
Answer:
There are whole lots of differences between the two political systems at that time. And this is largely because Igbo communities were too fragmented and each of the community was autonomous with its unique political system.
Looking at it closely, Igbo political system was acephalous. There was no specific head in most of the Igbo communities. Whereas, Yoruba political system was monocephalous. Each Yoruba community had a head — An Oba or a Baale.
Igbo people adopted gerontocracy as the Council of Elders effectively took up the functions of managing the affairs of the state. But, monarchy was in place among Yoruba people.
Unlike in Yoruba kingdoms, Igbo communities rarely had standing armies. Such arangement was usually made when there a war against an enemy.
Being a monarchy, the leadership transition was through heredity. Most times, a child of the deposed, abdicated or dead Oba succeeded him. Whereas, Igbo system was typically Republican. Neither Ofo nor Ozo title was attained through heredity, but through age and wealth.
Igbo people neither had taxation nor tribute system, but Yoruba people had a tribute system.
Unlike among the Igbo communities where each community was totally autonomous, many Yoruba kingdoms regarded Oyo as their political headquarters.
Igbo political system emphasized egalitarianism, age and persuasions; Yoruba political system was characterized by political power, legitimacy and check and balances.