People were angry about the terrible losses in world war 1
This is a complex question that I cannot really explain easily. I can give you some hints though.
It is difficult to say Machiavelli was right or wrong with what he was saying. We have to put his words into the context of Italy, Europe in those times which lead him to say what he did. Had he lived today, chances are he would say something else. Or not.
Furthermore, I wouldn't say we can always expect our political leaders to be virtuous and effective (although this would be great) but it often happens that through cunning and strategy some get to top positions and aren't really suitable for them.
To begin with Constantine turned into a Christian and quit oppressing them. Second Constantine chose to move to Byzantine which he at that point changed to Constantinople.
The primary Roman head to guarantee change to Christianity, Constantine assumed a compelling part in the decree of the Edict of Milan in 313, which announced religious resistance for Christianity in the Roman realm.
They first came a long time ago
Answer:
✨Hope this helps✨
Explanation:
✨Whereas Smith saw the maximizing of self-interest resulting in a state of equilibrium, Karl Marx saw exploitation, or a situation where an individual is not receiving benefits to meet his or her needs.✨
✨GOD LOVES YOU✨
