Water is the answer that I got
Hi!
The correct options would be Direct Quotations and Paraphrasing.
Textual evidence refers to those lines or statements that substantiate a claim. In our case, while analyzing a literary piece, we can incorporate direct quotations, or paraphrase particular lines from the essay that support our argument or opinion.
Direct quotations are lines cited unaltered directly from the essay, and are incorporated between quotation marks. This is the most effective form of textual evidence.
Paraphrasing entails that the same idea, fact or message conveyed by the author in the essay are mentioned in the analysis in one's own words.
The thesis statement is clearly defines the topic of the analysis and all the textual evidence must be presented in a way to support it. It, itself, cannot be textual evidence.
The summary of the plot would be the brief account of the essay, and may not necessarily be as effective in proving a claim, and does not qualify as effective textual evidence when analyzing a literary essay.
Similarly the biography of the author may or may not relate to the literary essay, and is hardly used as textual evidence.
Hope this helps.
It's a fragment because it needs a complete cause.
"For Terrel and him, exploring the cave was a real adventure" is correct. When trying to figure out these types of sentences, try removing the first subject (Terrel) and seeing how it sounds.
Answer:
You have every right to be angry, but that doesn't give you the right to be mean.
He drank life before spitting it out.
My Mum tries to be cool by saying that she likes all the same things that I do.
Explanation: