The ethical path of the information is illustrated below.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Emotivism is a theory that claims that moral language or judgment is neither true nor false. It encourages us to express our emotions; try to influence others to agree with us.
According to emotivism, Jane Doe should tell her parents about her sexual attraction and Joe and Mary should go for IVF.
Also, ethics is the principle of right or wrong. It's not based on what's written in the religious books. These principles help an individual how to learn how to be in a society, and how to be legally privileged. Natural law ethics will agree with the decision because these are ethically appropriate.
Joe and Mary had lost their first child and they need to go for IVF for their second child. There is nothing wrong with this and it's legally and ethically approved for parents who are not fertile to go for IVF.
The unethical path is that Jane Doe has a sexual attraction toward same-sex and this is an act of lesbianism. This is unethical.
Learn more about ethics on:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Pay most attention to things they already agree with, and interpret events according to their own predispositions.
Explanation:
This is explained to be a process where an individual is seen go perceive methods in which things that done by he/she is seen to be right; it can fall in to be a stereotype towards a person or on a thing making you ignore totally the opposing viewpoints. This directly lets the said individual visualize exactly what is made up already in his mind and not being totally rational, making he/she blind towards the real deal. In the case above, individuals tend to vote for a political party, only because it caters to your beliefs, not reasoning on the candidates value to he/she. Therefore, it pay most attention to things they already agree with, and interpret events according to their own predispositions.
I think you cannot have either without the other one, because you cannot have freedom without justice, but you cannot have justice without freedom either. "There can be no freedom without justice, no justice bereft of freedom<span>."</span>
The correct answer is: "One mental image can have both analogical and symbolic representations".
An analogical representation is a mental image that contains the physical characteristic of the object. For example, a map.
On the other hand, symbolic representations are abstract, as they do not resemble the features of the object. The main example of symbolic representation is writing, which refers to certain realities without using at all its physical features. Another example could be a logo.
<u>Some mental images can be simultaneously analogical and abstract.</u> Imagine a logo of a company. Most logos are totally abstract, as the ones of Nike or Lacoste which do not inform visually that they are related to a clothes brand. On the other hand, a logo can contain some of the physical characteristics of the underlying product/service/activity, such as the one of the WNBA (attached below). It is actually a cartoon which shows a woman playing basketball.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Establishing harsh slave codes to prevent further uprisings.
