Answer:
the availability of scarce resources needed for production
Explanation:
The production possibilities frontier model - PPF shows how much an economy can produce of two different products typically showing production goods such as machinery and consumption goods as donuts, there is a tradeoff between the products along the curve and any point in which this trade off occur is efficient.
The only ways to shift the curve outward or inward is by a change on technology that affect both of the goods, by trade, or <u><em>by the availability scarcity of the resources needed to produce. those goods
</em></u>
Answer:
$4,200 over applied
Explanation:
For computing the over applied overhead, first we have to find out the predetermined overhead rate which is shown below:
Predetermined overhead rate = (Total estimated manufacturing overhead) ÷ (estimated direct labor-hours)
= $327,080 ÷ 14,800 hours
= $22.1
Now we have to find the actual overhead which equal to
= Actual direct labor-hours × predetermined overhead rate
= 13,900 hours × $22.1
= $307,190
So, the overhead over applied would be
= Actual manufacturing overhead - applied overhead
= $302,990 - $307,190
= $4,200 over applied
It is generally uncommon for people to decide a place of residence based on <u>E. credit score </u>
When people look for places to stay, they think about their:
- Lifestyle and what house it suits that
- Their needs from a place
- Their values and whether the place would support them
- Attitudes towards what kind of place they should live
People only think about the credit score when it comes to paying the rent of the place or being able to buy it. It is generally not a factor when selecting a place of residence initially.
In conclusion, most people do not select residence based on credit score.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/19435264. </em>
Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
a) Implementing an urban planning project is an example of speculative risk. There is a huge uncertainty before implementing a project as well as after its implementation regarding its gross outcomes. Projects of any type can completely fail. But there are some cases that they succeed; they may spawn some positive outcomes for a specific community. In any project, there is always a probability of both gain and loss.
b) There are a lot of possible adverse outcomes of this type of risk. Maybe the project is not running sustainably. The ground condition may not be suitable afterward, but inclement weather can reduce the desired project utilitarian. It can attribute an adverse impact on the present environment. Assume that the budget cross before the implementation of that project. Finally, these sorts of adverse outcomes may result in the project’s failure.
c) Project risk can also beget some positive outcomes. In this type of threat, after implementation of that project, it may run sustainably. The ground and atmospheric conditions may appear suitable for this specific project. The approved budget may consider sufficient for the project implementation. That is how; these sorts of positive outcomes may result in the project’s success.
d) These types of risks, both positive and negative, may create unexpected expenses. If we think about the real risks, to manage these risks, we should exploit, share and enhance the specific risk, And in case of managing the harmful risks, we should transfer into a better resource-based project or try to mitigate the negative impacts of the project. Both of these efforts can be considered as unexpected expenses.
e) To protect myself against the real risks, I’ll exploit the specific risk. Because operating the risk is about increasing the chances of positive effects, the risk may have on the project. But if it is about the detrimental risks, I’ll try to avoid the risks by doing some activities like delegating tasks, changing the deadline, and increasing the human resources of the project team.
