Answer: $8.81
Explanation:
To solve this, add the present values of the dividends from years 3, 4 and 5 and then add the present value of the terminal value of the stock at year 5.
Year 3 dividend = $0.50
Year 4 dividend = 0.50 * (1 + 49%) = $0.745
Year 5 dividend = 0.745 * 1.49 = $1.11005
= Dividend in year 3 / (1 + required rate of return)³ + Dividend in year 4 / (1 + required rate of return)⁴ + Dividend in year 5 / (1 + required rate of return)⁵ + (Dividend in year 5 * (1 + growth rate) / ( required rate of return - growth rate ) ) / (1 + required rate of return)⁵
= 0.5 / 1.16³ + 0.745/1.16⁴ + 1.11005/1.16⁵ + ( 1.11005 / (16% - 9%)) / 1.16⁵
= $8.81
To be useful for decision making, information should possess the fundamental qualities of relevance and <u>Faithful representation</u>.
<h3>What is faithful representation?</h3>
Faithful representation can be defined as the financial accounting concept that stated a company financial position which they present should be correct with what the company has as their financial statement.
It is paramount that a company a financial statement is accurate to what they present in the financial statement and should not be compromise.
Therefore To be useful for decision making, information should possess the fundamental qualities of relevance and <u>Faithful representation</u>.
Learn more about Faithful representation here:brainly.com/question/14506917
#SPJ1
Answer:
b. 51,429 units
Explanation:
If x = Number of units
Net Income = Sales Revenue - Variable Cost - Fixed Cost
or
Net Income = Contribution Margin - Fixed Cost
where,
Net Income = $80,000
Contribution Margin per unit = $3.50
Fixed Cost = $100,000
Contribution Margin = Net Income + Fixed Cost
$3.50x = $80,000 + $100,000
$3.50x = $180,000
Dividing the above equation by $3.50 we get
x = $180,000 / $3.50
x = 51,429 units
Hence 51,429 number of units must be sold to generate the net income of $80,000.
Answer:
<em>HELLO</em><em> </em><em>CAN</em><em> </em><em>U</em><em> </em><em>TELL</em><em> </em><em>ME</em><em> </em><em>HOW</em><em> </em><em>TO</em><em> </em><em>SEE</em><em> </em><em>LEADERBOARD</em><em> </em><em>HERE</em><em> </em>
<em>I</em><em>N</em><em> </em><em>AUSTRALIA</em><em> </em><em> </em>
<em>I</em><em> </em><em>AM</em><em> </em><em>FROM</em><em> </em><em>INDIA</em><em> </em><em>AND</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>M</em><em> </em><em>HERE</em><em> </em><em>TO</em><em> </em><em>EXPLORE</em><em> </em><em>THE</em><em> </em><em>ASTUTRALIAN</em><em> </em><em>BRAINLY</em><em> </em>
<em>PLEASE</em><em> </em><em>HELP</em>
<span>in the long run we would expect this tax cut to </span>C. increase the level of real GDP.
Tax cut will give the private sectors more resources to either increase the number of employees or buy materials for production.
Either decision will lead to an increase in overall productivity which will contribute to additional Gross Domestic Products.
