What role did the war in iraq and the collapse of the economy play in the 2008 presidential election?

History

2 answers:

REY [17]3 years ago

5 0

<span>They were the two key issues of the election. </span>

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

4 0

The correct answer is the following.

<em>With no doubt, the war in Iraq and the collapse of the economy in 2008, played an important role in the US Presidential election of 2008.</em>

After many years in Iraq, journalist and American citizens still questioned the reasons for the US invasion on Iraq. It was supposed that Iraq had mass destruction weapons. That is why the US troops invaded the Middle East country. By after so many years, they couldn't find any weapon of mass destruction. So people were upset with the money spent on war.

The economy was the other big issue. The economy collapsed in 2008 after the Freddie Mac crises and the number of people that were in trouble for losing his homes. Many big financial institutions collapsed, such as Merry Lynch and PJ Morgan. These events, of course, upset American people and they found in Barack Obama an option for change.

You might be interested in

What are three themes that became important during the Renaissance? family, entertainment, fame, feasting, leisure or fashion

alisha [4.7K]

I think it would be:
Entertainment
Leisure
Fame

4 0

3 years ago

Indira Gandhi became India’s first female prime minister because

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Indira Gandhi became India’s first female prime minister because the people of India voted her in.

In the 1967 Lok sabha election, Indira Gandhi, the prime ministerial candidate of Indian National Congress won a landslide victory and thus became the first female Prime Minister of India. She remained PM of India from 1967 to 1977 and again from 1980 to 1984.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Name one problem that led to the Civil War.

Doss [256]

The answer is D because the north didn’t like slavery but the south did

8 0

2 years ago

What did Andrew Jackson refer to as "the monster?”

Elenna [48]

Based on what i know he thought the bank was the monster. hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

How did the decision of Miranda v. Arizona impact due process for accused persons

eduard

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago