Answer:
The minimum cost will be "$214085".
Explanation:
i) When quantity = 1-1500, price = $ 12.50 , and holding price is $12.50 * 20 %= $2.50.
ii) When quantity = 1501 -10,000, price = $ 12.45 , and holding price is $12.45 * 20 %= $2.49.
iii) When quantity = 10,0001- and more, price = $ 12.40 , and holding price is $12.40 * 20 %= $2.48.
know we should calculate the total cost of EOQ1 and break ever points (1501 to 10,000)units
The total cost is less then 15001. So, optimal order quantity is 1501, that's why cost is = $214085.
Answer:
$20,000 income
Explanation:
<em>Computation</em>
Particulars Amount
Sale Value of corrected product= $42,000.00
(2,000 * 21)
Less : Costs of Correction = ($12,000.00)
(2000 * 6)
Less : Opportunity costs - Salvage Value Lost = <u>($10,000.00)</u>
(2,000 * 5)
Incremental Revenue= <u>$20,000.00</u>
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
Answer:
a. $8,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the amount of overhead cost assigned to the product I is shown below:
= $40,000 ÷ 2,500 × $500
= $8,000
Hence, the amount of overhead cost assigned to the product I is $8,000
Therefore the correct option is a.
