Answer:
1. d) There was a lack of evidence that the students ' actions disrupted learning.
2. c) Students have fewer privacy rights in school than in other public settings.
3. d) Brianna's 1st Amendment rights (freedom of speech) were violated, and her actions did not cause any disruptions to the day-to-day functioning of the school.
4. c) New Jersey v. T.L.O.
5. a) Bell's recording provided grounds for a substantial disruption and interference with normal school activities.
Explanation:
- The court ruled that the school administration's search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook in this instance did not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment applies to everyone in the school, including the administrators.
- On June 25, 2009, the Supreme Court upheld, reversed, and remanded. In a judgement made by the court in the 4th amendment case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the Court decided that the search did not meet the "reasonable suspicion" requirement for searches of kids in a school context.
- Due to the policy's vagueness and potential for discriminatory application, the court found it illegal. The court also said that Brianna's 1st Amendment rights had been violated because her actions didn't change how the school normally ran.
It was General Horatio Gates who commanded the American soldiers in 1777 between September to October who held captive the five thousand eight hundred (5,800) British soldiers that at the same time under General Burgoyne at Saratoga near New York. This war took place during the American Revolutionary War. The victory ended so great in favor of the Americans causing some French to side the Americans. This scenario was called to be the turning point of the war between the France and the United States of America.
the answer is d. It basically wanted to wanted to "acclimatize" Native Americans to white culture. it forced 160-acre homesteads into the hands of individual Indians and their families with the promise of future citizenship.
Avant-garde, in French, refers to the people or the experimental, innovative works in art, culture, politics, philosophy and literature. It represents an impact on the limits of what is currently accepted as the status quo especially in the cultural scope. This renewal, modern movements were first produced in Europe in the first decades of the 20th century, from which it extended to the rest of the continents, including <em>Latin America</em>.
To <em>Latin America</em>, the avant-garde movement arrived as the artistic answer to important social changes that they were facing by the time, changes defined by events like World War I (1914-1918), The Spanish Civil War (1939-1939), and World War II (1939-1945). This period is also considered as the Hispanic postmodernism. This avant-garde movement represented a breakdown with the rhetoric and harmonic tradition from modernism, and transformed the poetical language. The <em>Latin American </em>poets from this movement wanted to create a language in a world in which there were no cultural frontiers; with their necessity to express national cultures through their own traditions in order to emphasize in the Latin America's identity roots, and the proliferation of a social message.
By that time, the countries in Latin America, had an autonomy, liberty and democratization eagerness; it is important to note that in Latin America, this movement was artistic but at the same time it was politic. The immediate precedent were: The Porfiriato in Mexico (1876-1910); in Brazil, the rebirth of the oligarchy until the 1920s; in Chile, the frustration of the democratic project by president Balmaeda; and in other countries, a liberal- oligarchic settlements represented by progressive sectors. In other words, Latin America was looking for their autonomy and their identity, assuming with this avant-garde movement the conflicts of a continent, reacting with the social circumstances generated by capitalism.
