Answer:
quick
Explanation:
Quick
Taft Bank is entitled to collect the money from Quick Corp. and not Pine because it failed to notify Pine of the assignment from Quick Corp. on time. So, now he can collect money from Quick Corp. only.
<span>When the developing country alpha breaks the rule of factories not being owned by the companies of developed country beta would imply that alpha is in a vulnerable position in its trade. So this means this would be an example of decline in trade and investment barriers.</span>
Answer:
a or b is the answer I am not sure so I gave two options
Answer:
The basic difference between both are explained below.
Explanation:
Explicit collusion is where firms meet and agree to charge the same price, and an example of implicit collusion is price leadership. Unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion unlike explicit collusion, implicit collusion is where firms signal to each other without actually meeting and agreeing to charge the same price.
Unlike explicit collusion, wherever the occurrence of an accommodation that would lend ammunition for an antitrust court case might be unscrewed, implied collusion is challenging to document as well as to verify. Implicit collusion frequently seems to be nothing more than all firms individually responding to shifting market circumstances.
Answer:
C. JIT
Explanation:
it is a methodology aimed primarily at reducing times within the production system as well as response times from suppliers and to customers.