Answer:
c. LeMond's net fixed assets as shown on the balance sheet will be higher at the end of the year.
Explanation:
Provided information,
There is a purchase of new production line. On which the company plans to charge depreciation as per straight line method for 5 years. As per the recent amendment the company has to charge depreciation fr 7 years under straight line method.
Thus, depreciation per year will be decreased.
As depreciation is an expense which is going to decrease with increase in duration, therefore, income will increase and accordingly taxes will increase.
Also the net balance of fixed assets will be higher, as depreciation is less.
Therefore, correct statement is
c. LeMond's net fixed assets as shown on the balance sheet will be higher at the end of the year.
Answer:
d. willingness to pay of all buyers in the market.
Explanation:
The demand curve shows the relationship between the price of a good or service and the quantity demanded at a particular time.
Therefore, a demand curve reflects:
a. highest price buyers are willing to pay for each quantity.
b.quantity that each buyer will ultimately purchase.
c. value each buyer in the market places on the good.
With this in mind, what the demand curve does not reflect, with these in mind is a willingness to pay of all buyers in the market.
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
Production= 25,250 units
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sales= 25,000 units
ending inventory= 700 units
beginning inventory= 450 units
To calculate the required production for the period, we need to use the following formula:
Production= sales + desired ending inventory - beginning inventory
Production= 25,000 + 700 - 450
Production= 25,250 units
For it to have international value
