According to a political perspective, the statement which is not an example of checks and balances is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president."</u>
<h3>What are Checks and Balances?</h3>
Checks and Balances are part of the government principle whereby government separations into different branches. Each is authorized to prevent actions by other branches and is prompted to share power.
Usually, the principle of checks and balances is commonly found in constitutional governments.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president</u>."
The available options are:
A. The supreme court can declare actions by the president and laws passed by Congress unconstitutional.
B. The president nominates supreme court justices, and the Senate must confirm the nominations.
C. The supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president.
D. The president can veto laws passed by congress, and congress can override a presidential veto.
Learn more about Checks and Balances here: brainly.com/question/8927972
A. The path from your eyes to the object they're viewing
Answer:
Local and State Governments
Explanation:
Although it could be Federal Government too, the best choice is local and state government, because on the 14th Amendment, it prohibited states from "Depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
Answer:
IM SO SORRY I RLLY NEED THESE POINTS
Explanation:
Answer:
ames is unable to pay all of his bills and pay his mortgage payment. His second mortgage lender forecloses the property. James has first mortgage, a second mortgage, and there is a mechanic's lien; his property taxes are also not paid. …