1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
3 years ago
10

Amy admits having physically done the crime she is accused of, but her lawyer claims she is not actually responsible for it. Whi

ch of the following would not be a possible defense for her?a. Insanityb. Strict liabilityc. Duressd. Reduced capacity
Law
2 answers:
kari74 [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. insanity

Explanation:

she's not sane

snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is strict liability.

You might be interested in
The key goal of the crime control model is
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:b

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
For the first 12 months after you are licensed. What two things can you not do?
cluponka [151]
For the first 12 months after you are licensed, you CANNOT drive between 11 p.m. & 5 a.m. , & you CANNOT transport passengers under 20 years old unless accompanied by a california licensed parent or guardian.
5 0
3 years ago
Power tools must be fitted with guards and what else
erica [24]
It must be fitted with guards and Safety switches
6 0
1 year ago
Hazirah has lent her money amounting to RM30,000 to her classmate, Intan. Intan has promised to pay her debt to Hazirah. Johan,
gulaghasi [49]

Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.

<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>

The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.

Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions.  We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer.  Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.

Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000.  And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.

Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.

Learn more  about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487

7 0
2 years ago
I do have to go back in and out of town to go and breakfast and eggs and breakfast eggs breakfast breakfast and eggs eggs breakf
ollegr [7]
Yummm eggs and toast and bacon
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain which type of child care facility James would be best suited for based on the scenario below.
    12·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST
    5·2 answers
  • what happenes if u commit sue a side bc i am about to do it bc ima bought to jump off a cliff right now and i need to know ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of technical writing for law enforcement and how should the information be presented for the audience to eas
    13·2 answers
  • What is the 2020 standard deduction for a 50-year-old married couple filing jointly, neither of whom is blind?
    7·1 answer
  • Should cereal be considered a soup?!?​
    5·1 answer
  • What are the three levels of court in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • What does “appeal” mean?
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a difference between the legislative producers of the house of representatives and senate.
    9·1 answer
  • Evaluate the impact of personal values onthe success of the census campaign
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!