Can you list the options? so i can help, theres not enough info for me to answer
C - no solution
you take the second solution and times the entire equation by -1
then simply
and you get 0x + 0y = 20
Well, notice the composite is really just 4 triangles atop sitting on top of 4 rectangles, and all of them area stacked up at the edges.
so, for the rectangle's sides,
front and back are two 6x3 rectangles
left and right are two 6x3 rectangles
the bottom part is a 6x6 rectangle
now, we don't include the 6x6 rectangle that's touching the triangles, because that's inside area, and is not SURFACE area, so we nevermind that one.
now, the triangles are just four triangles with a base of 6, and a height of 4, in red noted there.
so, just get the area of all those rectangles and the triangles, sum them up and that's the
surface area of the composite,
The information given about the proof does that Daniel made an error on line 2.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Given:
1. AB = 3x +2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38
2. AB + BC = AC incorrect (not an angle angle addition postulate)
3. 3x+2 + 4x + 8 = 38 correct
4. 7x + 10 = 38 correct
5. 7x = 28 correct
6. x = 4
Daniel made an error on line 2.
Here is the complete question:
Daniel wrote the following two-column proof for the given information. Given: AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 Prove: x = 4 Statements Reason 1. AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 1. Given 2. AB + BC = AC 2. Angle Addition Postulate 3. 3x + 2 + 4x + 8 = 38 3. Substitution Property of Equality 4. 7x + 10 = 38 4. Combining Like Terms 5. 7x = 28 5. Subtraction Property of Equality 6. x = 4 6. Division Property of Equality On which line, did Daniel make his error? line 2 line 3 line 4 line 5
Learn more about proof on:
brainly.com/question/4134755
#SPJ1