Answer:
The statement that would prove that Zeke made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and a a former employee can raised a grievance
Explanation:
Based on the information given about Zeke who is the employer , Gavin the employee and the formal employee who was dismissed The statement that would prove that Zeke the employer made a faulty decision is that Both an employee and the former or ex employee can raised a grievance reason been that settling dispute due to Grievance at a place of work can only take place with a current employee and not a formal employee , ex employee or a dismissed employee.
Therefore resolving Grievance at a place of work often take place with an employee with in the work environment and not with a formal employee.
<span>The Constitution makes it clear that the Congress, rather than the President of the United States, has power to assign</span>
Answer:
he was discriminated solely based on his sexual orientation.
Explanation:
The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stated that all employers in united states are prohibited to discriminate their employees based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and sexual orientation.
You do not need to be married for your sexual orientation to be acknowledged by the The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 . You just need to proof that any of the factors above are the reason why you're discriminated against.
In Qiang case, he could tried to find witness by talking to other employees or find a recorded email/messages that indicates his boss mistreatment toward him. If there are enough employees who came out as witnesses, he could build a strong enough case to gain support in the court.
The alignment of the yes and no arrows is confusing in some portions
