Answer:
a. +150, b. -15 yards, c. -75 feet, d. +35 degrees, e. -$24.75
Step-by-step explanation:
You are just evaluating the (-) and (+) symbol based off the term being used. If they are gaining something its a (+) if its a loss in any way shape or form it is a (-)
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
take x =initial deposit amount. then make equation:
x+75.5+55.25-25.15-18.65 = 210.85
simplify:
x+86.95 = 210.85
x=210.85 - 86.95
x=123.90
so Initial deposit amount is $123.90
check: 210.85+18.65+25.15-55.25-75.5 = 123.9
123.9 = 123.9
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
2% increase on 1750=
1750 * 1.02 = 1785
1785 per month gives 1785 * 12 = 21420 per year.
Divide 21420 by 48 weeks = 446.25 per week
Divide 446.25 by 45 hours = 9.92 per hour
13/25
first off, to turn a fraction into a decimal, you divide numerator by denominator
in this case, 13/25=.52
answer is .52
