All categories

2 years ago

Write the equation in slope-intercept form. 5x + 5y = 35

Mathematics

1 answer:

vekshin12 years ago

4 0

Answer:

y = -x + 7

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Equality Properties

Multiplication Property of Equality
Division Property of Equality
Addition Property of Equality
Subtract Property of Equality

Algebra I

Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + b

m - slope
b - y-intercept

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

[Standard Form] 5x + 5y = 35

Step 2: Rewrite

Find slope-intercept form.

Subtract 5x on both sides: 5y = -5x + 35
Divide 5 on both sides: y = -x + 7

You might be interested in

Mr. Lane is 6 feet 4 inches tall. His daughter, Mary, is 3 feet 8 inches shorter than her father. His son is 9 inches taller tha

algol [13]

2 feet and 1 in. Explanation is subtract 3’8 from 6’4 then add 9in too it. Feet can only go to 12in. But you’ll get 3’4. Then add 9 and you’ll get 3’13 so you’ll get 4’1 and then just subtract that from 6’4 and you get 2’1

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does anyone know this?

Natalija [7]

it is 24 vjsnvfvfjobbjgbnjg ngnbb

7 0

2 years ago

Fred cut an 84 centimeter rope into 2 parts and gave his sister one part. Fred's part is 56 centimetres long. His sister cut her

Vladimir79 [104]

Hi,
Since Fred's part was 56 cm, his sister's was 84-56=28
She cut it into 4 parts, so 28/4=7 cm
Her rope was 7 cm long.
Hope this helps you.

7 0

2 years ago

Suppose a certain type of fertilizer has an expected yield per acre of mu 1 with variance sigma 2, whereas the expected yield fo

mart [117]

Answer:

See the proof below.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we just need to apply properties of expected value. We know that the estimator is given by:

$S^2_p= \frac{(n_1 -1) S^2_1 +(n_2 -1) S^2_2}{n_1 +n_2 -2}$

And we want to proof that $E(S^2_p)= \sigma^2$

So we can begin with this:

$E(S^2_p)= E(\frac{(n_1 -1) S^2_1 +(n_2 -1) S^2_2}{n_1 +n_2 -2})$

And we can distribute the expected value into the temrs like this:

$E(S^2_p)= \frac{(n_1 -1) E(S^2_1) +(n_2 -1) E(S^2_2)}{n_1 +n_2 -2}$

And we know that the expected value for the estimator of the variance s is $\sigma$ , or in other way $E(s) = \sigma$ so if we apply this property here we have:

$E(S^2_p)= \frac{(n_1 -1 )\sigma^2_1 +(n_2 -1) \sigma^2_2}{n_1 +n_2 -2}$

And we know that $\sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2_2 = \sigma^2$ so using this we can take common factor like this:

$E(S^2_p)= \frac{(n_1 -1) +(n_2 -1)}{n_1 +n_2 -2} \sigma^2 =\sigma^2$

And then we see that the pooled variance is an unbiased estimator for the population variance when we have two population with the same variance.

8 0

2 years ago

Jill's mother limited her xbox 1 playing to 10 hours per week. she played on only four days, a different amount of time each day

Brrunno [24]

You have to find out how much time she played on Saturday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday. Let's look at the facts.
Sunday: No info is given.
Friday: She played the least of all four days
Saturday: Twice as much as Wednesday
Wednesday: No info is given.

We can write a problem and solve from this information. Let's use the variable W for Wednesday. Saturday is 2W. So whatever number Wednesday has, multiply it by 2. All of the total numbers should equal 10.

Since Friday was played the least amount, we know that every other day has to be at least 2 hours or above, so that Friday can be 1 hour. Sunday we have no info given.

This is a bit of guess and see for this problem. Let's say that Friday was 1 hour, Wednesday was 2, Sunday was 3, and Saturday was 4. Total that equals 10. Let's check to varify that these numbers are correct.

Friday was the least amount of hours of any day, which is why it is 1.
Wednesday had 2 hours, and Saturday had twice that many, which is 4.
Sunday has 3 hours.

In short, your answer would be: Friday 1 hour, Wednesday 2 hours, Sunday 3 hours, and Saturday 4 hours. I hope I explained it wel

6 0

3 years ago