Answer: School Judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics based on the individual. I know this because everybody makes mistakes, and if you base a person off the mistakes they might've made in the past, your biased and unfair. From my background knowledge, I remember a show on TV called divorce court, this man was judged because of mistakes he did when he was fifteen, he didn't even know better, and he might've been battling his own mind, he didn't deserve to be judged based on his past mistakes. In conclusion, judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics of an individual because it's biased.
Explanation:
The correct answer is letter A. <span>DeJonge v. Oregon was the case that established "clear and present danger" doctrine in terms of an individual's freedom of association. This was a case in the United States Supreme Court that the Constitution's 14th amendment applies to the freedom of assembly of its constituents.</span>
The pull factors that attracted European Jews to Eastern Europe during the late Middle Ages were that Jews were attracted to Eastern Europe because they could practice Judaism there without any persecution.
So A.
