Answer:
He wants the next president to be honest and truthful and make sure to keep his promises that he makes and do everything for the people and only the people.
Explanation:
The appropriate response is "The Crime Control Period"
The Crime Control Period is the below:
- media and government officials underscore the peril of wrongdoing, including adolescent wrongdoing, prompting open requests for a crackdown
- harsher disciplines for adolescents who perpetrate violations
- waivers: juvi court postpones its ward, exchanging an adolescent case to the grown-up criminal court
- Schall v. Martin 1984 - adolescents can be held in preventive confinement if there is worry that they may carry out extra violations while anticipating court activity
Answer:
Aqueduct
Explanation:
An aqueduct was an artificial channel for conveying water, typically in the form of a bridge across a valley or other gap.
Answer:
The 15th Amendment gave African American men the right to vote which would mean they can vote in general elections and possibly completely change the outcome of an election
Explanation: The 15th amendment was ratified during reconstruction after the civil war and still with racism rolling through the south African Americans could now vote how they wanted, but throughout reconstruction southern states would try numerous times to limit the black vote through poll taxes and other things.
The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy-- who was seven-eighths Caucasian-- took a seat in a "white's only" car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested.
QUESTION:
Is Louisiana's law mandating racial segregation on its trains an unconstitutional infringement on both the privileges and immunities and the equal protection clauses of the 14th amendment. (Is it unconstitutional, basically.)
ANSWER: No the state law is within constitutional boundaries. The judges based their decision on the separate-but-equal doctrine (keep in mind this was in 1896), that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. In this case, they ruled that segregation does not, in itself, constitute unlawful discrimination.
Basically everything about Plessey v. Ferguson.