I would say A however I am not sure
Answer:
If you are asking how well recognized and concerned your country of residence is with education I'd answer that in all first-world countries it is seen as a symbol of pride and is very much so important. If you are asking if it is regarded as being more important to educate your child in your own country as opposed to another, I would say this greatly depends on perspective and personal values.
Explanation:
This is a very intriguing question that should be asked by everyone that has children of their own.
In my own situation, I was educated from preschool up till highschool in the United States as I am American but since had pursued university overseas in France. A newer trend in France is to take the globally free education and to make it very expensive for those that are not a French National. The Government reasons that by doing so foreigners will understand the value of education and will not view their previously free courses as being of lesser quality than those taken in the United States for thousands of dollars.
Answer:
well comment which one your talking about
Explanation:
and then i can help you okay?
so says under this thing which one your talking about
B) Summarizing the text that the group has read
C) Sharing an idea, claim, or theory about the story
D) Asking other participants questions about what they feel
Thesis #1: One of the main themes in the first two chapters of The Call of the Wild is that men are just as greedy, violent and competitive as dogs when put in harsh circumstances.
The Call of the Wild is a story of transformation in which the old Buck—the civilized, moral Buck—must adjust to the harsher realities of life in the frosty North, where survival is the only imperative. Kill or be killed is the only morality among the dogs of the Klondike, as Buck realizes from the moment he steps off the boat and watches the violent death of his friend Curly. The wilderness is a cruel, uncaring world, where only the strong prosper. It is, one might say, a perfect Darwinian world, and London’s depiction of it owes much to Charles Darwin, who proposed the theory of evolution to explain the development of life on Earth and envisioned a natural world defined by fierce competition for scarce resources. The term often used to describe Darwin’s theory, although he did not coin it, is “the survival of the fittest,” a phrase that describes Buck’s experience perfectly. In the old, warmer world, he might have sacrificed his life out of moral considerations; now, however, he abandons any such considerations in order to survive. Buck is a savage creature, in a sense, and hardly a moral one, but London, like Nietzsche, expects us to applaud this ferocity. His novel suggests that there is no higher destiny for man or beast than to struggle, and win, in the battle for mastery.
