1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
6

What are some reasons for limiting authority

History
2 answers:
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
6 0
Without limited authority, dictatorships pop up. In the United States we use checks and balances to limit authority so that none of the branches or someone in a branch can take control. This can also help keep prices low.
In basic day to day life, limited authority makes it to where say a supervisor can't take advantage of an employee. hope that helps!
Anettt [7]3 years ago
3 0
Without authority, the world would be totally chaos, with authority everyone could be safe, yeah nobody likes the rules but that's life, we gotta deal with it. Also, without authority we have higher crime rates, higher grand thefts, higher homicides, etc.
You might be interested in
According to the Big Five, a person who can be described as disciplined, punctual, and organized most likely scored high in ____
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

D. conscientiousness is the correct answer.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Between the civil war and world war i, the u.s. monetary system:
Goryan [66]
Made more paper money.  Print baby, print.      

Back by gold standard, until 1960's.  
7 0
3 years ago
The four freedoms:
kirill [66]
Was a campaign slogan of the republican party
7 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe the shogunate in feudal Japan? Choose three correct answers.
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

a,d,e

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
were HUAC and senator McCarthy justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists
alexandr402 [8]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

No. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and senator McCarthywere not justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists.

What Senator McCarthy basically did was to accuse many members of the United States federal government and the US military, but he never showed any valid evic¿dence that supported his accusations.

We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who accused many that many people of supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Amendment addressed the moral issue of alcohol.
    11·2 answers
  • which statement describes an unwritten requirement for becoming president rather than a requirement laid out in the u.s. constit
    9·1 answer
  • The first europeans who came to canada were french true or false
    15·1 answer
  • This German Epic would lay the foundation for loyalty and would subsequently provide the foundation for feudalism: The Song of R
    11·1 answer
  • Which scientists contributed ideas that became part of the scientific method? Select all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • What four men represented the federalist in the ratification battle
    13·1 answer
  • The Nazis made Jews wear _________ on their clothing.
    8·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS!!! How did the entrance of the Ottoman empire on the side of the Central Powers affect the war?
    15·1 answer
  • Why did nicholas want to switch russia to a constitutional monarchy
    12·1 answer
  • Origins: 200,000 years ago
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!