1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
10

The term appeasement is best defined as

History
2 answers:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
7 0
Appeasement<span> is a political context is a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to an enemy power in order to avoid conflict.</span><span>
</span>
Ronch [10]3 years ago
6 0
I'd say it's best defines as a Verb, and the definition would be: To bring to a state of peace, quiet, ease, calm, or contentment; pacify; soothe. I hope this helps! ~Mia
You might be interested in
NEED ANSWER ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!! Under the Truman Doctrine, the United States agreed to
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

1 or A

Explanation:

With the Truman Doctrine, President Harry S. Truman established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces. Truman asked Congress to support the Greek Government against the Communists.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following reasons encouraged migration to and settlement in the new land
Rama09 [41]
God( religious recruitment)
Gold( they wanted money)
Glory(wanted fame)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are two reasons why Jackson won the 1828 election
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

Jackson and his supporters called it the stolen election because of the deal between Adams and Clay. ... He won the election of 1828 with the help of Speaker of the House Henry Clay. He was an unpopular President . While he was President Congress, passed the Tariff of 1828.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Federalist feel about the Bill of Rights? How did Anti-Federalist feel about the Bill of Rights? plz give some kind of e
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

1. The Federalist believed that there is no need for inclusion of Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that Constitution restricted the government not the individuals or citizens.

2.  The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people

Explanation:

1. The Federalists believed that there is no need for inclusion of the Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that the Constitution restricted the government, not the individuals or citizens. - The Federalists which was spearheaded by the likes of Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, wrote various documents termed as "Federalist papers" (sometimes referred to as Publius) where they argued their case against the Bill of Rights. Their conclusion was that the Bill of Rights would only impede the rights of the people rather than safeguard them.

2.  The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of the Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people - These group of people argued their case in various papers termed as Brutus, Centinel etc. One of the major personality in this camp is Patrick Henry.

Their submissions amongst others, were that the new constitution can turn the central government to be a threat to their individual liberties.

8 0
2 years ago
Which sentence describes a cause of the decline of the Roman Republic? A.There was a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion.B
Delvig [45]

The sentence describes a cause of the decline of the Roman Republic: A.There was a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion

<h3>Explanation: </h3>

The Roman Republic is the era of classical Roman civilization, it beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC and ends in 27 BC. Whereas The Roman Empire is the ancient Rome post-Republican period that consist of large territorial holdings around the Mediterranean sea in Europe, North Africa and West Asia. The difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was primarily one of a patina of democracy versus outright dictatorship

A slave rebellion is an armed uprising by slaves. It have occurred in nearly all societies that practice slavery in the past. A desire for freedom is the greatest objects of song, art, and culture amongst the enslaved population.  It is an armed uprising by slaves and  occurred in nearly all societies that practice slavery or have practiced slavery in the past.

The decline of the Roman Republic caused by a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion. A labour shortage itself is an economic condition where the employers believe that there are insufficient qualified candidates  to fill the marketplace demands for employment

Learn more about the Roman Republic:  

brainly.com/question/4710581

#LearnWithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The president’s role as chief executive is to
    12·2 answers
  • Where did real Americans originate
    8·2 answers
  • If you were to walk south from the western USA, What country would you enter????
    14·1 answer
  • What does the authority means?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these monarchs had the shortest reign?
    10·1 answer
  • How was the Korean War a flashpoint of the Cold War
    10·1 answer
  • When did fuedalism begin
    12·2 answers
  • Read the statement from Friedrich von Gentz about the Congress of Vienna.
    10·2 answers
  • What was the result of the Persian War?
    5·1 answer
  • Why does David, “fear no evil” in this psalm? How do you think this helped him get
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!