How did Britain prosper by controlling the trade of the American colonies?

2 answers:

7 0

The correct answer is B) Britain imported raw materials from the colonies and sold its finished products to the colonies.

Britain prospered by controlling the trade of the American colonies in that Britain imported raw materials from the colonies and sold its finished products to the colonies.

The British colonies grew crash crops that later were exported to Britain. They processed them and were sold to the American Colonies. The Americas had many raw materials and natural resources and Britain wanted to profit from them. For instance, the case of tobacco in the Virginia plantations. Tobacco in the Americas was more gray and bitter than tobacco in Europe and had great success in Europe.

Another way to profit from the colonies was the heavy taxation that the British crown imposed to the colonies such as the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, or the Tea Act.

Rudik [331]3 years ago

5 0

D. Britain sold finished goods to the American colonies for slaves from its Caribbean colonies.

You might be interested in

Immediately after World War II what did many holocaust survivors fear

pochemuha

Oh dear here we go... They feared a lot of things when they came out. But mostly another genocide imposed on the jews. Many of the jews went to palestine, to make what is todays Israel.

3 0

3 years ago

The question of who within the federal government had authority over reconstruction was a major source of debate. What was linco

rodikova [14]

Southern states had never left the Union, so the executive branch had authority over Reconstruction.

They commonly have been led with the aid of using the White yeomanry and that they dominated Southern politics in maximum regions from the 1870s to 1910. in some unspecified time in the future at some point of Reconstruction, the South was underneath career by way of manner of federal forces, and Southern state governments were dominated via Republicans, elected in huge component by using freedmen and allies.

Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction has become referred to as the 10 percent Plan, which he was hoping might be straightforward and doable for Southern states. The plan required that former Confederates take an oath pledging allegiance to the Union and accepting the quitting of slavery.

The number one distinction between Lincoln's plans for reconstruction and Johnson's became regard to the rights of freedmen following the realization of the Civil conflict. Even as Lincoln wanted to ensure rights, together with vote casting, for the formerly enslaved, Johnson's plan did now not have these equal necessities.

Learn more about governments here: brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

A federal judge who interprets the constitution literally is considered to be a

tia_tia [17]

The correct answer is originalist. These are judges who interpret the constitution based on their understanding of what the founding fathers meant and wanted with it. Opposite would be a pragmatist, a person who understands that the constitution changes due to the spirit of the age changing.
<span />

5 0

2 years ago

Who is the god that ate his children?

nadezda [96]

Answer:

Kronos

Explanation:

He ate his children who were gods because he saw that they were going to overthrow him

3 0

1 year ago

What did the Framers of the Constitution create to resolve disputes between the states?

Sveta_85 [38]

During the Constitutional Convention of 1789, there was a dispute regarding the representation of the states in Congress. The large states wanted the number of representatives in Congress to be proportional to that state's population. On the other hand, the smaller states wanted the number of representatives per state to be equal among all states.

The "Great Compromise" was a solution to this. It was a combined proposal of the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. It concluded that the House of Representatives (Lower House) should have a proportional representation according to the population of each state. Regarding the Senate (Upper House), The representation would be limited to 2 senators per state, regardless of the number of people living in each of them.

5 0

3 years ago