Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor to weaken/neutralize the U.S. Pacific Navy in doing so it allowed for Japan to continue in its process in getting natural resources from Malaya and the Dutch East Indies. (oil, rubber)
I believe the answer is restraint or alienation of property
Restraint of property refers to a situation when a person is somehow banned from selling their properties. During conflict of ownership, the law does not allow the selling of properties until the person who had the full right to sell the property is determined.
<span>Cross-cultural literacy is the answer you are looking for.</span>
Answer:
Gasoline prices tend to increase when the available supply of gasoline decreases relative to real or expected gasoline demand or consumption. ... Even when crude oil prices are stable, gasoline prices fluctuate because of seasonal changes in demand and in gasoline specifications.
C Demand
Explanation:
