That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
I would say D. Most consumers didn't stay away from the company
because if your trying to boycott something then you are protesting against that company and you are not using whatever that company has, so if the consumers didn't stay away then they would still use and be around the company and that is not the purpose of boycotting
Hope this helps!! :D
During Angolan civil war, there are 2 groups who fight for the power in Angola : MPLA and UNITA
The civil war turned into cold war battle ground because the MPLA was supported by Uni Soviet and the UNITA was supported by United States
Answer:
Figure out what you're good at and what needs work:
· First, Seek Your Skills.
· Next, Find Your Strengths.
· Finally, Find Your Weaknesses.
· Join Short Classes or Courses.
· Take Part In Relevant Activities.
· Practice.
· Being Mentored.
· Keep Yourself Relevant.
