1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
9

RAnDoM tHoUgHt..........

World Languages
2 answers:
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Haha always good to have random thoughts

bekas [8.4K]3 years ago
6 0
Ok Namaste to you to i would like to say so kindly
You might be interested in
(Nepali) मान्छेको भाग्य कसरी बलियो र राम्रो हुन्छ?​
Assoli18 [71]

मानव को भाग्य बल्यो हुनको लागि भगवानको पूजा गर्नुपर्छ

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED HELP ASAP IL GIVE BRAINLYNESS
laila [671]

<em>Answer: The third-person omniscient point of view allows readers to glimpse into a character's head, hear their inner thoughts, and understand the motivations of myriad different characters—in a way that would not be possible in strictly first-person narration.</em>

<em />

<em>Explanation: I just searched it up. Thank you for asking that question! :D</em>

7 0
1 year ago
You must wash your hands between changing gloves? A. TRUE B. FALSE
Aleksandr [31]
You do not have to wash your hands before putting on gloves, although I do. I have OCD. It's just force of habit. In this case, I would not say true or false because it really depends.There's no rule that says you have to wash your hands before putting on gloves. Although, doctors will meticulously wash their hands before they put on gloves before surgery, even if they are putting on gloves, to make sure no germs travel through the plastic on their behalf and infect the patient internally. But relating to normal checkups, they do not wash their hands before putting on gloves, they just put them on.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. the first amendment to the constitution prevents the government from interfering with the free exercise of religion. the litu
Dimas [21]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

The 1st Amendment states, quote:

<em> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...</em>

Now, this may be seen as the government not being able to interfere with banning the practice of human sacrifice. However, based on <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878), The Supreme Court ruled that religious duty is not a defense against criminal indictment.

On top of that, human sacrifice in the modern world is deemed as a murder, as the victim is typically not consenting. If, however, they are, it may still be deemed as manslaughter. Under <em>Section 18 of the US Code 1111</em>, Murder is defined as, quote <em>the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought... or premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect death of any human being other than him who is killed</em>. (Section a, Section 18, U.S. Code 1111).

Within the religious liberties that are protected by federal law, it is stated under <em>Executive Order 13798 </em>(82 FR 21675 - Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty). The most important part to look at from this order is section 2, which states that <em>The free exercise of religion includes the right to act or abstain from action in accordance from one's religious beliefs</em>, and in section 10, which states that the given act <em>prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening any aspect of religious observance or practice, </em><em>unless imposition of that burden on a particular religious adherent satisfies strict scrutiny. </em> (Emphasis added, Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, RFRA 1993). In this case, the scrutiny is satisfied as the religious practice breaks US Code 1111 Section 18, as stated above. Therefore, <em>the government can be allowed to interfere with this particular practice. </em>

<u>Laws & rights in use in this case, as well as court decisions:</u>

- 1st Amendment, U.S. Constitution

- <em>Reynolds v. U.S. </em>(1878) - Chief Justice Morrison Waite.

- Section 18, US Code 1111

- Executive Order 13798

- Federal Law Protections for Religious Liberty, Religious Freedom Restoration act, 1993.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Learn more about Religious Freedom, here:

brainly.com/question/4773712 - Freedom of religious worship is guaranteed by...

<em />

3 0
2 years ago
PLZZ HELP ME!!!! 1.Which sentence uses italics or quotation marks correctly? A. Ms. Franz recommends Walter Lord's book titled "
Fudgin [204]
The first answer should be A, I hope this helped
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the political organization of most ancient Greek settlements? A. Greek settlements all fell under the control of the Gr
    12·1 answer
  • Is french language based off of religion?
    10·1 answer
  • A Estatística é uma ciência que tem como intuito descrever procedimentos para coletar, organizar, resumir, analisar e apresentar
    11·1 answer
  • What is online interaction
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP WITH THESE QUESTIONS!!!!! THEY ARE IN PICTURES!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What else should I write about my family ?
    12·1 answer
  • Comma Exercises
    14·1 answer
  • Can anyone translate this <br> salanghae,wil neon nawa gyeolhon hae
    14·1 answer
  • in a two digit number the tens digit is one more in a two digit number the tens digit is one more than toys the unit digit the s
    6·1 answer
  • What was the opening price of Dow Jones Industrial Average on May 22, 2017 in the format of XXXXX.XX?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!