1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katovenus [111]
3 years ago
8

Which statement explains why the Supreme Court get involved in the 2000 presidential election

History
1 answer:
Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court got involved in the 2000 presidential election because there was a controversy over the counting of votes in Florida.

Explanation:

The presidential election in the United States of America in 2000 took place on November 7th. It opposed the Republican candidate George W. Bush and the outgoing Democratic vice president Al Gore. In terms of popular vote the latter prevailed, but the electoral votes, 271 against 266, were favorable to Bush and determined his election.

It was in Florida that the result of the national election was finally played out. Some Democrats, convinced of their victory in the state, accused the governor of the latter, Jeb Bush, the brother of the Republican candidate, to have favored the election of his brother by rigging the electoral process. Jeb Bush denied the charges and then withdrew from all the judicial and administrative proceedings that followed. The Electoral Code aggravated the controversy over the name of the winner because it specified that the recount must necessarily take place by reading perforated cards or manually in four counties maximum. However, the machines used being often old, it happened that the hole had been badly pierced meaning for the machine that it was a blank vote.

At the end of the electronic recount, George Bush was still a winner with about 1,500 votes in advance. Al Gore's lawyers then obtained a new manual recount in three counties deemed to be favorable to the Democrats, those of Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Broward, where in fact he was most likely to pick up voices perceived as null or blank by electronic machines and turn them into votes cast in his favor.

However, the manual recount of the polling stations did not change the result of November 7th. Several judges, seized by Al Gore's lawyers, allowed further recounts by ordering different methods according to the polling stations, while others refused to do so considering that the recount had been correctly carried out. Seized by Al Gore's lawyers, the Florida Supreme Court (of which six out of seven judges were Democrats) then ordered the recount to be held in all disputed counties, but before December 12th, when the results were due to be officially proclaimed.

On December 1, 2000, George W. Bush's lawyers appealed to the US Supreme Court, citing the breakdown of equality before the law because of the different methods used to count and override the Florida Court's jurisdiction.  

After a first warning to the Florida Supreme Court of the overreaching of its prerogatives and its encroachment on the legislative domain, the US Supreme Court (of which seven judges out of nine had been appointed by Republican presidents) ruled by 7 votes against 2 in Bush v. Gore on December 12th that the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court was unconstitutional and, by 5 votes to 4, that it was impossible to carry out a constitutional recount within the time allowed by the US Constitution unless violating several legal principles related to equity and equality before the law. In doing so, it canceled the final manual countdown of votes in Florida, and named George W. Bush as the winner of the presidential election; with the votes of Florida voters, Bush won 271 electors against 266 for Al Gore.

You might be interested in
First large city-state of the americas
pishuonlain [190]
The colonial period lasted approximately three centuries, from the early 16th to the early 19th centuries, when Brazil and the larger Hispanic American nations declared independence. The United States obtained independence from England much earlier, in 1776, while Canada formed a federal dominion in 1867
5 0
3 years ago
How did building new England towns and cities around a common help colonies develop a divers economy
Otrada [13]

The building of New England towns and cities around a common helped the colonies by creating a diverse economy for numerous reasons. If towns and cities were built around a common, more people from different areas would be acquiring goods from other regions. This opened doors for trading and selling items, which happened a lot during this time. Trading different goods and items from different areas helped people spread culture and diversity. More people were able to get things they wouldn't have been able to before because of shipping ports where they lived. Along with items being easier to obtain, they made profit by selling goods to other countries, like Europe.

8 0
4 years ago
19. Why was the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) created?
kogti [31]

Answer:It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of the securities markets. The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the causes and effects of the progressive movement from 1890-1920?​
Agata [3.3K]

Causes:  The problems caused by industrialization, urbanization, immigration, and political corruption. Reconstruction in general after the Civil War also contributed - people were just trying to improve America.

Effects: The 18th Amendment (prohibition of alcohol), the 19th amendment (women's right to vote).

8 0
3 years ago
Which act of legislation strengthened the Sherman Antitrust Act by spelling out the specific activities in which businesses coul
aalyn [17]

A. Clayton Antitrust Act

This was meant to add more specific regulations to the Sherman anti-trust law ('restraint of trade'). This law says specifically what companies cannot do. They cannot: -Lower costs to only some people -Force another business to sell only one company's goods -Buy another company if this makes a monopoly -Stop labor unions from trying to get more wages and better working conditions from companies

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best summarizes how American families are changing?
    11·2 answers
  • The task of using fossils to match up rocks of similar ages in different areas is called _____.
    8·2 answers
  • How do you think the American entry into the war will affect the conflict in Europe
    11·1 answer
  • You perform an experiment to see how the amount of sunlight to which a plant is exposed affects its height. Which of the followi
    9·1 answer
  • What is the best Dwayne johnson movie
    13·2 answers
  • What is the color of pakistan flag
    15·2 answers
  • WHO WAS THE PERSON WHO EXPLORED CHINA AND<br> CREATED THE SILK ROADS?
    14·1 answer
  • How many kings regined during the ministry of isaiah two three five or four
    5·1 answer
  • 50 points!
    5·1 answer
  • Could the New Mexico territory have developed as well as it did without the contributions of its early civilizations? State your
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!