1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
6

Forum non conveniens: a. is a principle of U.S. justice. b. is a principle of jurisdiction. c. can require a case to be sent out

of the U.S. d. all of the above
Law
1 answer:
Setler79 [48]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

all of the above

Explanation:

Forum non conveniens talks about the discretionary power that allows a court to dismiss a case brought before it when there seems to be another court or forum that is in a better position to handle the case than the court where the case was first brought into.  

This can be triggered either by the sued party or by the law court and the party that initiates the lawsuit can re-file his or her case in those identified appropriate forum or courts. This doctrine applies between courts in different countries and between courts in different jurisdictions in the same country.

You might be interested in
What term refers to criminal committed against people based on their race or religion
Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

hate crime

Explanation:

I searched it on google I attached a photo

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Free eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Flura [38]

Answer:

thank youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
So I prank called this scam company here's there number and have fun
muminat
What is the company from?? What do they sell??
7 0
3 years ago
Assume that the state legislature of Kansas passes a law providing that confessions are admissible in state court criminal cases
avanturin [10]

This law is unlikely to be constitutional.

The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.

3 0
3 years ago
How are presidential vetoes and congressional overrides related to partisan control of government?.
Helen [10]

Congress's power to override the President's veto forms a “balance” between the branches of the lawmaking power.

3 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • _has (have) existed in the American political system since the early nineteenth century.
    9·2 answers
  • Who must obey the law in the United States?
    11·2 answers
  • Describe the process of the selection of federal judges
    5·2 answers
  • Approximately how many<br> Floridians are involved in Alcohol<br> Related Crashes weekly?
    9·1 answer
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the judicial branch?
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Which type of newspaper article would be treated as a secondary source, even if it was written near the same time as the even
    13·1 answer
  • Whats the penalty for a school zone violation
    14·2 answers
  • The different parts of the disaster management cycle generate different planning requirements. In a similar way, levels of plans
    7·1 answer
  • What is a Complaint?
    7·2 answers
  • Which type of law involves incidents in which an individual commits an act against the public as a whole
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!