1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir79 [104]
3 years ago
11

Differentiate stare decisis from Eminent Domain

Law
1 answer:
tatyana61 [14]3 years ago
7 0

Stare decisis can be defined as a legal doctrine whereas eminent domain refers to the power of the federal government or state.

The differences between stare decision and eminent domain are as follows:

  • Stare decisis is used as a benchmark to deal with similar cases whereas eminent domain creates a standard of dealing with private property cases.
  • Stare decisis can be overruled according to the requirement of the case whereas the eminent domain cannot be overruled.
  • Stare decisis helps in dealing with cases whose judgement is not simple whereas eminent domain helps in deriving land from private owner for the sake of public construction.

Learn more about stare decisis:

brainly.com/question/21085371

You might be interested in
Công ty TNHH Hết hạn có 03 thành viên. Công ty muốn phát hành cổ phần vào tháng 12/2021 để chuyển đổi thành công ty cổ phần. Nhậ
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

Tôi khá chắc chắn là "Được rồi.".

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The two primary methods of interpreting the Constitution are to look at the document’s __________ when it was composed and its c
Otrada [13]

Answer:

Original intent, living document

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

4 0
1 year ago
All of the following statements about patents are true except: a. in order to be patented, an invention must be nonobvious. b. t
Ghella [55]

Answer:

d. It is more difficult to obtain a copyright thatn it is to obtain a patent.

Explanation:

As long as the patent or a written work fils the requirements for both registration it won´t be diffucult.

5 0
3 years ago
If person B kills person C because person A says " if person b doesn't kill person C then person A will kill person B and his/he
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

for sure, person B wouldn't be charged with murder

Explanation:

because person B was basically forced to do it by person A, the charge would prolly go to person A

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the definition of "Constitutional Monarchy"? And what is the importance of it?
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

Definition of constitutional monarchy:

a system of government in which a country is ruled by a king and queen whose power is limited by a constitution.Constitutional monarchy shares power with a constitutionally organized government.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The United States Constitution and _____________________________________ establish the fundamental principles and rules by which
    9·1 answer
  • The political viewpoint that favors social tradition and restraint from regulating business is called
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following items is not one of the five purposes of government?
    9·2 answers
  • students shouldn’t do Those Type of Things To Teachers asking Them out on a date or kissing The school Teacher Touching Them The
    7·2 answers
  • Help please text timed ASAP !!
    7·2 answers
  • Which situation is the best example of competition in an economic system? A restaurant just opened down the block from a movie t
    12·1 answer
  • Ideas, beliefs, or attitudes about what is important are _________.
    5·1 answer
  • 2+2<br> a:3<br> b:5<br> c:70<br> e:none of the above
    11·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast enumerated and implied powers in TWO paragraphs describing the similarities and differences between these t
    15·1 answer
  • What types of investment (low,med,high) can result in losing money?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!