Answer:
Background: The idea that everyone should strive to be a ‘productive citizen’ is a dominant societal discourse. However, critiques highlight that common definitions of productive citizenship focus on forms of participation and contribution that many people experiencing disability find difficult or impossible to realize, resulting in marginalization. Since rehabilitation services strive for enablement, social participation, and inclusiveness, it is important to question whether these things are achieved within the realities of practice. Our aim was to do this by examining specific examples of how ‘productive citizenship’ appears in rehabilitation services.
Methods: This article draws examples from three research studies in two countries to highlight instances in which narrow understandings of productive citizenship employed in rehabilitation services can have unintended marginalizing effects. Each example is presented as a vignette.
Discussion: The vignettes help us reflect on marginalization at the level of individual, community and society that arises from narrow interpretations of ‘productive citizenship’ in rehabilitation services. They also provide clues as to how productive citizenship could be envisaged differently. We argue that rehabilitation services, because of their influence at critical junctures in peoples’ lives, could be an effective site of social change regarding how productive citizenship is understood in wider society.
Implications for rehabilitation
‘Productive citizenship’, or the interpretation of which activities count as contributions to society, has a very restrictive definition within rehabilitation services.
This restrictive definition is reflected in both policy and practices, and influences what counts as ‘legitimate’ rehabilitation and support, marginalizing options for a ‘good life’ that fall outside of it.
Rehabilitation can be a site for social change; one way forward involves advocating for broader understandings of what counts as ‘productive citizenship’.
Explanation:
hope it's helpful
This is a personal question. In case the opinion expressed below is not in agreement with your own, feel free to edit the answer.
Answer and Explanation:
Yes, I believe women still need to fight to be heard. Of course, the degree to which they will have to fight depends on several variables: culture, religion, economic and social status, etc. I believe the reason why that is still true today lies in the long history of oppression. Change comes slowly - in some places even more than in others. It takes time for the oppressed to learn their own strength, and even more time for the oppressors to admit to their wrongdoings. Another reason why it is still true lies in the fact that powerful figures often have no interest in seeing the status quo shift to benefit the oppressed. People who should be serving others, such as politicians, would rather keep things the way they are to benefit themselves, afraid that change will withdraw some of their power.
Answer:
Supermax
Explanation:
Supermax is a term used for those prisons which have the top criminals. Within the US territory, there is a federal maximum security prison located in Florence, Colorado where solitary confinement or "lockdown" is the treatment for those criminals.
The prisoners are isolated in a way that their location in a cell involves a very high level of security and prevents them from escaping or revolting.
There are further reasons for isolating for periods of 22 hours per day the inmates.
It is believed that effective and safe management of prison population<em> will be ensured and still some major organizations like Amnesty International criticize the "effectiveness of the model" since a Supermax is an extremely isolated environment where almost no human contact takes place.</em>
<u>The questioned method of treating humans in these conditions still is very debatable among punitory systems for their social implications.</u>
The term motivation refers to the psychological forces that determine the direction of a person's behavior in an organization, a person's level of effort, and a person's level of persistence. The motivation can be intrinsic or extrinsic. Intrinsic motivation behavior that is performed for its own sake, while extrinsic motivation is behavior driven to acquire material or social rewards and avoid punishment.