Answer:
A group comparison study
Explanation:
In group comparison study, an experiment compares two groups(the beareaved and nonbeareaved adults in the above study) such as in testing the effects of a treatment where a "comparison group" receives either an alternative treatment or no treatment so that it functions as a source of "counterfactual" causal inference for the purpose of the experiment.
Options available are:
A) Wait until the next day; maybe the children will be ready to discuss it later.
B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.
C) Tell the children to listen carefully an+9d reread the story aloud very slowly to facilitate understanding.
D) Stop reading the story until students are more engaged in the text.
Answer:
B) Pause periodically and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story and to ask questions about anything that is unclear.
Explanation:
The right answer is Option B due to the following reasons:
1. By pausing periodically, and ask the children to explain or "recap" what has happened thus far in the story, will encourage the children to be involved, by trying to impress the teacher that they are actively following the teacher or the story. With such strategy, those students will want to listen attentively to be get what the teacher is reading, and then narrate it when asked.
2. By letting them to ask questions about anything that is unclear, will not only give room to for students to get clarification about any ambiguity in the story, but also give room for interactions with the teacher, and opportunity to evaluate when and where they seem lost in the story.
Answer:
There are many pros and cons to this concept.
The pros are that we have better materials for protection and offense for our military. Also, this gives individuals better defense, as well.
The cons to this concept is that people in the wrong state of mind can easily injure or worse kill vulnerable people.
So what does this say about the United States in general?
The United States is like a pan balance; if there aren’t many weapons, there will be fewer massacres, shootings and robberies. But, say someone in a situation where that does happen, there is a higher and unfortunate chance that they won’t be able to protect themselves. If there are lots of weapons, there will be more crime, but also an increase in defense & protection and a decrease in vulnerability.
The United States is full of extremely intelligent people which can have dangerous consequences. An increase in weapons technology is another step up in nature and it shows America’s power, brilliance, and intelligence. This will make the U.S. military undefeatable.
