Answer:
i think its y=3 and the x=2
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps
Hello!
Judging by the question it seems that the problem is asking for the total cost of the sweater after tax, which means you were close with your previous two guess.
8.5% in a number would be 0.085 and 100% in a number would be 1.
Thus, the answer you are looking for is 1.085!
Hope this helped!
-Blake
For all values of x less than 7.5 the above inequality satisfies , i.e 
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Inequalities are the relationships between two expressions which are not equal to one another. The symbols used for inequalities are <, >, ≤, ≥ and ≠.
reads as '7 is greater than x' (or ' x is less than 7', reading from right to left).
reads as ' x is less than or equal to -4' (or '-4 is greater than or equal to x', reading from right to left).
reads as ‘ x is not equal to 5.
Here , we have
{ Dividing both sides by 2. }
∴ For all values of x less than 7.5 the above inequality satisfies.
Answer:
2x^2 -x +1 = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
For roots α and β, the original equation can be factored as ...
f(x) = 2(x -α)(x -β)
If we add 1 to each of those roots, the factors become ...
g(x) = 2(x -(α+1))(x -(β+1))
This can be rearranged to be ...
g(x) = 2((x -1) -α)((x -1) -β)
That is, we can get the desired equation by replacing x with x-1, effectively shifting the function right one unit.
2(x -1)² +3(x -1) +2 = 0
2x^2 -x +1 = 0
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
The State gets money out of charging taxes. If they lower taxes they will have less budget, so they will need to cut on the budget. In this case, if they will lower taxes on the welthiest, then they will have more resources, and be richer.On the other hand, the poorest will be poorer since the state will spend less on them, in conclusion as wealthy people will get richer, and poor people poorer, equality will reduce, since the difference between the tails on the distribution will increase.
On the other side, a financial process is said to be tax efficient if it is taxed at a lower rate than an alternative financial process that achieves the same end, so in this case, tax efficiency will increase