I agree with the person above - the correct answer is He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
This line clearly shows how different these two men are - pines and apples are obviously quite different. On one hand, there is this neighbor who wants to build a wall between him and the world, and on the other, there is our narrator who wants to tear the wall down.
<h3>
Answer:Yes</h3>
Explanation: There is no positive effect of war
<h3 />
Answer:
B. the rhythm of the lines
Explanation:
According to the given poem "White Eyes", the line breaks in between the stanzas are there to insert a pause from the final word to the start of a new line which sets the rhythm of the poem.
Therefore, if the poet broke the lines, it would change the rhythm of the lines.
Rehearsing discussion responses is not a strong discussion making technique.
Answer: Option (a)
<u>Explanation:</u>
While in discussion, one should have a natural response to the topic that is being discussed. This instant response ensures us about the real psychology of the person who is presenting his views in the discussion.
Every perception is necessary to understand the contradictions that are raised by other people of the group. Rehearse discussion is not the best technique to be followed in a group discussion.
This discussion expresses the ideas of an individual in a loud manner so that others get affected while expressing their views in the group discussion.
Answer:
When Orwell relates his experience with the elephant in “Shooting an Elephant” it gives some insight into his own psyche as well as the structure of imperialism. In this moment, he criticizes imperialism, showing that the leaders are controlled by the masses just as much as, if not more so than, the other way around.
He describes himself as being despised by the Burmese people. He is a colonial policeman, and in this role, he is associated with imperial British rule, propped up by the threat of force. (Orwell himself served in the Indian imperial police for a time, so the narrator's voice is likely his own.) When the elephant tears through the bazaar, killing a coolie, the Burmese crowd demands that he shoot and kill it. He does not want to do this, because by the time he arrives on the scene, the elephant has calmed, and no longer poses a threat to anybody. Orwell reflects that, in order to appease the angry crowd, he has to fill the role that they expect of him, which is that of a hated "tyrant." This is the paradoxical nature of empire- he must compromise his morality, become what the Burmese people already think he is, or risk their laughter and scorn. For someone that has already determined that he hates British imperialism, the incident is profoundly unsettling, but in a "roundabout way enlightening." It underscores the duality of empire, a world in which a man like Orwell can, as he says in the account, hold remarkably contradictory feelings:
The incident illustrates that, whatever objections they may have to British rule, imperial officials have to be hated to be respected.
Explanation:
