Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
Several factors have contributed to the shrinking size of the American middle class after the early 1970s. One of them includes "the emergence of the low-wage service sector."
Other factors that contributed to the shrinking size of the American middle class during this period include:
Greater demand for higher-skill jobs;
The huge income gap between the high paid executives and employees in the middle ranks;
Fewer opportunities for those with little education.
Global competition and advancement in technology;
Surging education fees, health care, and housing cost;
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the middle class in the United States is smaller today compared to the time before 1970.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/23755166
Answer:
How one is reborn has nothing to do with caste.
Explanation:
The answer is --
How one is reborn has nothing to do with caste.
Buddhism treat people equally and they believe that every human being born is equal in the eyes of all. They believe in 'rebirth' and 'life cycle'.
They believe that if a person do good deeds they will lead to good result and reaction. And if a person does bad deed they result bad reactions. After death, a person is reborn according to the deeds they have perform ion their past life. It has nothing to do with the caste in which they are born.
<span>The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The CIA mostly functions as a way to protect national information from enemy foreign entities as well as to protect national intelligence in the form of technology and industry. However, during the 1960s largely due to the political climate of the time, there were abuses of power.</span>
