Answer:
The answer is c:
Enforceable via employee agent
Explanation:
The definition of agency law deals with agent-principal relationships; that is a relationship where one party has the legal authority to act in place of another. Relationships that are commonly associated with agency law include employer-employee, administrator-decedent or executor, and guardian-ward.
Agreements that result in the formation of agency-type relationships can be implied or express, and both the principal and the agent can be an entity (such as partnership or corporation) or individual.
Here in the given situation, since, Elaine is an employee of the business and knowledgeable enough to deal with the contract filing, it is implied that she is acting as an employee agent, that she can help the customer in filing the contract.
Answer (Marginal costs)
The answer is marginal costs because they are the highest in the margin.
Hope this helps have a nice day :)
Answer:
Possible causes of material quantity variance:
1. The use of sub-standard material
2. The use of unskilled labour
3. Wastage of material
Explanation:
Material quantity variance is the difference between standard quantity and actual quantity used multiplied by standard price. The use of sub-standard material reduces the quality of output thereby resulting to unfavorable material quantity variance. The use of unskilled labour also leads to unfavorable material quantity variance. Wastage of material due to low quality of inputs also results to unfavorable material quantity variance.
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Particulars Cost Per unit in ($)
Direct Materials $6
Direct Labor $2
Variable Overhead $1.5
Fixed Cost ($77000 ÷ 35,000 units) $2.2
Total Cost per unit $11.7
So,
1. He will buy the product as it is a saving of $0.7 ($11.7 - $11)
2) The most price willing to pay is $11.7
3) And, There is increase in income by $24,500 by multiply the 35,000 units with the $0.7 per unit in case of buying the part
Answer:
Explanation:
Victor's recognized gain equals to zero, because this exchange qualifies under Sec. 368 as a tax-free reorganization.