Answer:
What is the time relationship between a President’s assumption of office and his taking the oath? Apparently, the former comes first, this answer appearing to be the assumption of the language of the clause. The Second Congress assumed that President Washington took office on March 4, 1789,1 although he did not take the oath until the following April 30.
That the oath the President is required to take might be considered to add anything to the powers of the President, because of his obligation to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, might appear to be rather a fanciful idea. But in President Jackson’s message announcing his veto of the act renewing the Bank of the United States there is language which suggests that the President has the right to refuse to enforce both statutes and judicial decisions based on his own independent decision that they were unwarranted by the Constitution.2 The idea next turned up in a message by President Lincoln justifying his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus without obtaining congressional authorization.3 And counsel to President Johnson during his impeachment trial adverted to the theory, but only in passing.4 Beyond these isolated instances, it does not appear to be seriously contended that the oath adds anything to the President’s powers.
Topics
Elections and Voting Rights
Explanation:
Answer:
The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865. The amendment was ratified by the required number of states on December 6, 1865. Wikipedia
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Mexican government feared Texas settlers were taking over Texas
Explanation:
The main impact the 1826 Fredonian Rebellion have on the Mexico/Texas relations is that Mexican government feared Texas settlers were taking over Texas. Fredonian Rebellion confirmed the fears of Mexican government officials that Americans were trying to take Texas from Mexico so for that they sent Mexican soldiers and militia from Austin's Colony in order to dissolve the revolt.
Answer:
The increase in settlements in the West caused the frontier line to disappear.
Explanation:
<span> 1. The constitution - the legislative branch cannot enact laws that violate the constitution. this limit is kinda limited in that the legislative branch could vote to change the constitution, but it would be extremely difficult and would also need ratification by 2/3 of the states.
2. the president- congress can pass laws, but they are not official laws until the president signs them. the president can refuse to sign a law the legislative branch has passed or veto them. with a super majoiity the legislative branch can override a veto though.
3. the people - the people vote for who is in the legislative branch. if we dont like what they do we can vote in new guys.</span>
