Answer:
Quota sampling
Explanation:
Quota sampling is a form of sampling techniques used in carrying out research studies. It involves, the use of special or specific characteristics to determine the respondents to pick by the researcher. After that, a required sample size is then picked from the population of interest. It is considered to be a non-probability sampling procedure.
Hence, in this case, when Ingrid first of all, used a certain characteristics to pick participants, the characteristics is participants from General Psychology Classes only.
The she will pick from the General Psychology Classes only, a certain proportion that will reflect University population in terms of ethnicity.
Therefore, this technique or sampling procedure is termed as QUOTA SAMPLING.
Answer:
The force applied will cause the object to be displaced from its equilibrium position.
However, the motion caused by the force on the object will be slight/minimal because of the small difference between the weight of the object and the force applied.
Explanation:
The weight of the object, W = 49.5 lbs
Force applied, F = 50 lbs
From the information given, it is observed that the force applied is greater than the weight of the object, i.e. F > W
Since, the force applied is greater than the weight of the object, the force applied is sufficient to cause a displacement of the object from the equilibrium position since it is known that the only cause of motion is force.
Answer:
James-Lange
Explanation:
James-Lange theory: In psychology, the James-Lange theory is described as one of the theories of emotions which was proposed by Carl Lange and William James. The theory states that an individual will interpret his or her physical reactions and after that made a conclusion of getting frightened.
According to this theory, an individual will interpret a particular physical reaction in response to the stimulus as "fear". However, a person feels frightened and then rush.
In the question above, the given statement is best explained by the James-Lange theory of emotion.
Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.
Explanation:
In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.
The Supreme Court is the head of the Judicial Branch.
